HomeDark TimesWWU-AMIN GENERALQUOTESHEROESSHARED DNABRITAINMUSICFILM/TVOTHER ARTS/BOOKSC2H5OHABOUT

♦ SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT ♦

I will now be blogging over at my new site:
http://thecampofthesaints.wordpress.com/

This site will remain as an Archive Site, for the foreseeable future, of all postings made before 23 December 2009.  Because of this fact, my domain [thecampofthesaints.com] will still direct you here for the time being.  I have issues to work out with the transference of my archives to the new site that will take some time.

Thank you for your indulgence and I apologize for any inconvenience or confusion.
Bob Belvedere

It's Time To ROC 'N' ROLL: Restore Our Constitution & Restore Our Lost Liberties


Dispatches from
The Camp Of The Saints...
by Robert Belvedere [DHS-Certified Rightwing Extremist / White House Certified 'Fishy' / Carter-Certified Raaaaacist!]

Archive Newer | Older

Saturday, July 25, 2009

RULE 5 SATURDAY [Updated - see below]
In compliance with Rule 5 and my Maker's Mark barrel, the TCOTS Rule 5 Compliance Committee presents....

JANE RUSSELL...

I wonder what's she doing now...
Jane-Russell-04-Bath-560.jpg

I hope she's thinkin' 'bout me, 'cause my heart says "Yes, indeed" in me
Jane-Russell-07-Legs-300.jpg

'Cause it's witchcraft...
Jane-Russell-06-fur-560.jpg

That sly come hither stare...
Jane-Russell-05-look-300.jpg

And I've got no defense for it...
Jane-Russell-08-V-300.jpg

The heat is too intense for it...
Jane-Russell-09-Hay-560.jpg

What good would common sense for it do...
Jane-Russell-03-Drink-300.jpg

Time to go folks...I'm running late and the Lady Jane doesn't like to be keep a-waitin...

They call you lady luck
But there is room for doubt
At times you have a very un-lady-like way
Of running out
Your on this date with me
The pickin's have been lush
And yet before the evening is over
You might give me the brush
You might forget your manners
You might refuse to stay
And so the best that I can do is pray...

Luck be lady tonight
Luck be lady tonight
Luck if you've been a lady to begin with
Luck be a lady tonight

Luck let a gentleman see
Just how nice a dame you can be
I know the way you've treated other guys you've been with
Luck be a lady with me

A lady never leaves her escort
It isn't fair, it isn't nice
A lady doesn't wander all over the room
And blow on some other guys dice

So lets keep this party polite
Never get out of my sight
Stick with me baby, I'm the guy that you came in with
Luck be lady tonight

A lady doesn't leave her escort
It isn't fair and its not nice
A lady doesn't wander all over the room
And blow on some other guys dice

So lets keep this party polite
Never get out of my sight
Stick with me baby, I'm the fella you came in with
Luck be a lady
Luck be a lady
Luck be a lady tonight
Eleven!

UPDATE:  Over at The Other McCain, Smitty has been good to your humble Dispatcher once again and linked to two TCOTS postings, this one and our Hump Day mini-Rule 5 here.  Thanks friend.  He's put together a great set of links, per usual.

Friend Paco has scored again with the best RULE 5 posting of the week: Rita Hayworth singing and proving that God does exist.  Damn the man.

The Classic Liberal was kind enough to link to my two RULE 5 postings in his Rule 5 Saturday posting.  He's been doing a very interesting set of postings called What Is Conservatism? and is almost finished.  When he does, I hope to offer some thoughts here.  Its well worth the read.

Capt'n William Teach, over at The Pirate's Cove, has up a great Patriotic Pinup by Gerald von Lind [and I'm proud to be an American...].  There also be some good linkage there, me hearty.
25 jul 09 @ 8:18 pm edt          Comments

BOB BELVEDERE!...I DIN'T KNOW HE WAS STILL ALIVE...
Please accept my apology for not having posted a single blessed thing in the past two days.

I've been working on a special project that I am hoping to unveil in the next day or so.

There will at least be a RULE 5...stay tuned...
25 jul 09 @ 8:11 pm edt          Comments

Thursday, July 23, 2009

SOCIALIZING HEALTH CARE
I've just added ten new links to the SOCIALIZING HEALTH CARE part of the JUST THE FACTS, MAM section of the WWU-AM page.

Here are highlights from three of them...

1)
From Dr. Helen:

...Obama shows himself not only to have no understanding of medicine, life, or the science of improving people's lives, but no empathy for those of us who have life threatening illnesses that require immediate medical intervention.

Some heart arrhythmias are deadly, and a doctor telling a patient to take a pain killer to treat V-tach or V-fib should be guilty of malpractice....

2)
Robert Stacy McCain on 'The National Endowment Fallacy':

...if you listen to Obama or other liberals discuss health care, you will soon discover that they have smuggled into the argument the hidden premise that no one can receive health care without health insurance. Therefore, the 40-odd-million "uninsured" represent a crisis, and government is the only solution to this crisis (or to anything else liberals consider to be a crisis).

Thus, the argument involves a false dilemma: Either the federal government must take action -- involving expenditure of tax dollars and various coercive regulations -- or else there will be no health care, at least for the "uninsured" who constitute the canary-in-the-coal-mine of the liberal argument against private-sector provision of health care.


Just another tool from the Leftist toolbox—a power tool in this case.

3) From Jimmie Bise:

At this point, we can be certain of three things about President Obama's health care plan, even after his speech Tuesday.

    1. Opposition to it is broad and bipartisan and includes Senator Barack Obama.

    2. You should take anything he says about with a planetary-sized grain of salt because, as we learned today, he's really not sure what's in it.

    3. It is going to be ridiculously expensive.

OBAMACARE DELANDA EST!
23 jul 09 @ 8:10 pm edt          Comments

UPSIDEDOWN YOU'RE TURNING ME
From The Washington Post, Glenn Kessler reporting:

The war of words between North Koreaand the United States escalated Thursday, with North Korea's Foreign Ministry lashing out at Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton in unusually personal terms for "vulgar remarks" that it said demonstrated "she is by no means intelligent."

...

The Foreign Ministry statement attacking Clinton also amply demonstrated the North Korean mood. "We cannot but regard Mrs. Clinton as a funny lady as she likes to utter such rhetoric, unaware of the elementary etiquette in the international community," a Foreign Ministry spokesman said, according to North Korean media. "Sometimes she looks like a primary schoolgirl and sometimes a pensioner going shopping."


I haven't looked out my window today: are pigs flying?  They must be because I find I'm in agreement with the North Korean Foreign Ministry.  Wow...it truly is a world turned upsidedown.
23 jul 09 @ 2:04 pm edt          Comments

RESISTANCE IS FUTILE
Let's see...the American [and I use that term loosely] Leftists want to, in a sense, import the Canadian Health Care System into the United States and assimilate it—you know, tweak the parts that don't work up North, then alter a few bits and pieces on the surface so it will be more acceptable to Americans.  The Lefties think they'll be able to do what no other country that has adopted government-run health care has been able to do: make it work.  Recent history shows that it has never worked wherever it has been tried and people have died as a result.  History also teaches that any imported idea of this kind can never be assimilated by the welcoming country.  Rather, the idea assimilates the country it emigrates to.  That's why I like to think of Obamacare as Borgcare.

The next question is: after we have been assimilated into this strain of Borg, what will the next one be?  How about Sharia?  Its already creeping into America like slimy ooze under an old door.  Perhaps, it will come through Canada?  [is there a pattern starting to take shape here?].

Over at The Corner, Mark Steyn provides us with two updates that answer the question 'Que Pasa Canada?':

Three or so weeks back, a submerged car was found in the Rideau Canal in Kingston, Ont., containing the bodies of three teenage girls and their aunt — a story initially reported as Mysterious Death Of 4 Quebecers Baffles Kingston Police. When it emerged that the four female Quebecers were, in fact, Muslim, the tearful parents offered up a strange tale of an impromptu midnight driving lesson gone tragically wrong (Driving Lesson May Have Led To Drowning).

La Presse
is now reporting that the girls' father, mother, and brother have been arrested en route to Montreal Airport, and that the deceased "aunt" or (alternatively) "cousin" was, in fact, the girls' father's first wife. The words "crime d'honneur" are beginning to creep into newspaper accounts.

Meanwhile, the blogger Scaramouche
suggests that, while they're looking into honor killings in the Kingston area, the constabulary might take a gander at another curious aquatic accident this month....

Please take the time to click here and continue reading his posting.

I am Barackus of Borg. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated. Your life as it has been is over. From this time forward, you will service us!
23 jul 09 @ 1:56 pm edt          Comments

IG-GATE: 'Threats Of Future Claims' Edition
I've added four new links to the IG-GATE part of the UNWELCOME DISTRACTIONS Section of the WWU-AM Page just now.

Here are highlights from two...

1) Over at AmSpecBlog, Robert Stacy McCain wherein he raises some questions.  Here's one:

If [Rep. Doris] Matsui [D-CA District which includes Mayor Kevin Johnson's Sacramento] contacted the White House before Walpin was fired . . . Well, this interview is certainly raising questions on Capitol Hill.

2) Over at The Washington Times, the Editors make a good point [tip of the fedora to Quin Hillyer]:

The Obama administration will have a hard time defending its actions against a suit by fired AmeriCorps Inspector General Gerald Walpin.

In our June 24 editorial headlined "Lieberman overlooks Walpingate," we suggested that the White House "verged on improper age discrimination by claiming the 77-year-old Mr. Walpin was 'disoriented' and 'confused' at a May 20 meeting." In a footnote to a lawsuit Mr. Walpin filed on Friday demanding his job back, Mr. Walpin's lawyers have written that "the [White House] conduct at issue raises serious questions of age discrimination, retaliation against whistleblowers and defamation."

The suit itself does not (yet) claim age discrimination -- but the threat of a future such claim, which is inherent in the footnote, is justified based on the circumstances.

3) I know the IG-Gate section over at WWU-AM is getting more difficult to read and use because of the large number of links that now reside there.  And I know, as this Scandal Train picks up steam, its going to get worse.  I am working diligently at a solution for this and hope to have it implemented soon.  Your patience and indulgence are much appreciated.

Keep checking back at WWU-AM for the latest on this Scandal Train as it keeps a rollin'.

WWU-AM — WE WARNED YOU, AMERICA
23 jul 09 @ 11:45 am edt          Comments

THE GANG THAT COULDN'T GOVERN STRAIGHT, SCENE III
[Click here for Scene I and here for Scene II]

The Scene: the Oval Office, Monday afternoon July 21st...

Rahm 'The Enforcer' Emmanuel enters the room...


R TE E: Hey boss, da CBO guy's waitin' outside. 

Fearless Leader: At least he's on time.  Anyone with him?

R TE E: Naw, he came by himself, just like we told him to.

FL: Good.  I don't want anyone outside of our Family to witness this.

R TE E: If he hadda brought someone, we wudda distracted dem.  I had Larry 'The Wimp' Summers waitin' in da Cabinet Room just in case, if you understand what I mean?

FL: That's why I love you Rahmbo—you're always thinking.

R TE E: Dat's why I'm still breathin' Boss.

Both men laugh...

FL: Good one conseligere of mine.  Alright, let's get this show on the road.  You ready Joseph?

Joe Hill Biden: Sure thing kid...I mean...Pop.

FL: Remember now: I want you to keep that yap shut and just sit there and look serious.

JHB: Okey-dokey.  You can rely on me.

R TE E: Shoud I brings him in?

FL: Yup, I'm ready.

R TE E goes out and comes back in with CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf.  During these few seconds, FL's appearence and demeanor change...

FL: Mr. Elmendorf. 

Reaches out his hand and, as they shake hands, FL pats him on the upper arm with his other hand...

DE: Mr. President.

FL: Rahm, please pour Senior Elmendorf some grappa.

R TE E does and hands it to DE...and they sit.  FL sits in a leather office chair with R TE E and JHB on one couch and DE on the other by himself.

DE: Mr. President.  Thank you for inviting me here, although I must say its highly unusual, what with the CBO Director supposing to be independent and non-partisan.

FL: My TARP credit good enough to buy you out?

DE: Buy me out?

Biden laughs nervously

FL: Changing your health care reform report.  Altering the cost figures.  The Obamleone Family wants to buy you out.

DE: The White House wants to buy me out?  No, I stay independent, you don't buy me out.

FL: Your report loses us support for health care reform.  Maybe we can do better.

DE: You think I slanting my reports?

FL: You're uncooperative.

DE: You goddamn Chicago guys, you really make me laugh. I do you a favor and go easy on Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae when you're having a bad time, and now you're gonna try and push me out!

FL: You went easy on Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae because the Obamleone Family arranged for the Frank Family to bankroll your Office, and the Pelosi Family on the Coast guaranteed their safety. Now we're talking business, let's talk business.

DE: Yeah, let's talk business. First of all, you're all done. The White House don't even have that kind of muscle anymore. Obamacare's sick, right?  The Inspector General Scandal's gonna explode wide-open soon.  You're slowly getting chased out of D.C. by Palin and the other Families.  What do you think is going on here?  You think you can come to the CBO and take over?  I talked to Boehner - I can make a deal with him, and still keep my independence!

FL: Is that why you verbally slap my Vice President around at parties?

JHB: Aw, now that, that was nothin', Bam.  Dougie didn't mean nothin' by that.  Yeah, sure he flies off the handle every once in a while, but me and him, we're good friends, right Dougie?

DE: I got an independent agency to run.  I gotta kick asses sometimes to make it stay independent.  He said some stupid things, Joey did, so I had to straighten him out.

FL: You straightened my VP out?

DE: He was banging out stupid statements two at a time!  Congressmen couldn't get a word in edgewise!  What's the matter with you?

FL: I leave for another townhall forum on health care tomorrow—think about a price.

DE: Sonofabitch!  Do you know who I am?  I'm the Director of the CBO!  I made my independent bones when you were selling cocaine to undergraduates!

JHB: Wait a minute, Dougie...Doug...I got an idea...

DE leaves angrily and slams the door on his way out.  The wind from the slam causes Larry Summers's comb-over to fall to the side of his head.

JHB: Rahm, you're the Consiglieri and you can talk to the Pres, you can explain...

R TE E: Da Boss is in charge of alla da Family business. If you have anything to say, say it to da Don.

JHB: Bam...you do not come to Washington and talk to a man like Dougie Elmendorf like that!

FL: Joey, you're my Vice President, and I love you old man.  But don't ever take sides with anyone against the Family again.  Ever.  Now go and lobby that Jew Congressman like we talked about this morning.

JHB:  [downcast] Yes sir.

FL: And stick to the party line this time.

JHB leaves with shoulders drooping.

FL: Rahm, get me Luca Sharpton.  I want him to make contact with this 'independent Director'.  He can tell him he's dissatisfied with the treatmenthe's getting at the White House and that he'd like to work with him on racial issues.  I want him to buddy-up to him, get him to confide in him, find out what's under his fingernails.  Then I want him to publicly charge the CBO office with widespread and institutional racism.  Have him consult with Henry Gates if necessary.

R TE E: Right away, Boss.  Ya sure yaz just don't want this CBO stroost to have an accident?

FL: Let's see if this way works first; there's been too much blood already.

R TE E: I getz him rightta way, Boss.

FL: Now, if there's nothing else, I'd like to get back to planning my trip to Martha's Vineyard.

End Scene.

From Jake Tapper at ABC News, we learned:
Republicans on Wednesday criticized as inappropriate a meeting President Obama held Monday with the director of the Congressional Budget Office, Douglas Elmendorf.

Elmendorf, a Democratic appointee, has been a thorn in the side of President Obama and congressional Democrats for the way he has analyzed health care reform legislation. In their view, Elmendorf hasn’t sufficiently given their health care reform proposals enough credit for cutting costs – which has caused them political problems in getting the legislation passed. Last week, frustrated at one analysis by Elmendorf, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., snapped, "what he should do is maybe run for Congress.”

“No one blames Mr. Elmendorf for accepting an invitation from the President of the United States,” House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, said in a statement.“The issue is whether it was appropriate for the White House to invite him to discuss pending legislation before Congress at all.”

Said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky: "I noticed that the CBO director was sort of called down to the White House yesterday. It strikes me as somewhat akin as the owner of the team asking the umpires to come up to the owner's box."

McConnell said that "if the CBO is to have credibility, they're the umpire. They're not players in this game."

CBO is tasked with providing “objective, nonpartisan, and timely analyses to aid in economic and budgetary decisions on the wide array of programs covered by the federal budget.”

The White House flatly rejected the idea that there was anything untoward about the invitation or the meeting, which took place on Monday for just under an hour....
23 jul 09 @ 8:31 am edt          Comments

Wednesday, July 22, 2009

u3v7wi4nq9
22 jul 09 @ 8:56 pm edt          Comments

IG-GATE: Rolling Up The TARP Edition
I've added seven more new links to the IG-GATE part of the UNWELCOME DISTRACTIONS Section of the WWU-AM Page just now.  That's a total of seventeen added just for today.  The Scandal Train is comin' 'round the bend.

One of the links added is to an ABC News podcast in which Jake Tapper and Huma Khan interview Neil Barofsky, Special Inspector General [SIGTARP] for the Troubled Asset Relief Program [TARP].  A highlight from their report on the podcast:

Barofsky told us that the Treasury Department “is not being transparent with respect to the TARP,” the $700 billion in funds (and more) the government is using as loans and bailouts to help stabilize the financial markets. “They’ve failed to adopt some very basic recommendations we’ve had toward transparency,” he said.

Called the “SIGTARP,” Barofsky appeared before Congress this week and told them that the government’s commitment to fix the financial system could potentially reach $23.7 trillion, and criticized the Treasury Department for calling his team’s estimate “inflated.”

“I think that the Treasury Department ought to read the report before they make comments, at least the spokesperson’s office,” Barofsky said. “Our methodology is laid out in black and white in the report. ... As far as the numbers being inflated, where do you think we got the numbers from? We got it from the Treasury Department, we got it from the Federal Reserve. ... If these numbers are inflated, it’s because they inflated them when they put them out in the public, not because of us.”

The inspector general defended the numbers outlined in his report, saying that all his team has done is to “gather the 50 programs, put them in one place, and told the American people what the government has said about the maximum of each of these programs.”

“Perhaps their criticism is that we dare to do math,” he said....


Ya think?

Keep checking back at WWU-AM for the latest on this Scandal Train as it keeps a rollin'.

WWU-AM — WE WARNED YOU, AMERICA
22 jul 09 @ 7:58 pm edt          Comments

IG-GATE: QUICK NOTE TO READERS

I am right now in the process of aggregating more IG-Gate related links [in addition to the ten I added this morning], but it will take me a bit to 'get r done'.  Your patience is appreciated.

To see what's linked so far, please click here.

If you can't wait for me to complete the task, Stacy McCain has already linked to some of them here.

22 jul 09 @ 5:17 pm edt          Comments

A LITTLE HUMP DAY RULE 5
Not only are Robert Stacy McCain, Byron York, Michelle Malkin, Ed O'Keefe on the hunt of those involved in the IG-Gate Scandals, but so is this gal...
Elvgren-Huntress-IG-Gate-300.jpg
and she's fit to kill.
22 jul 09 @ 11:04 am edt          Comments

TRISTISSIMUS HOMINUM*
Over at Paco Enterprisesthe ever-perceptive Paco has noticed a change in Tiberius Obamacus's demeanor now that he's having trouble getting his way for the first time in his life:

...His speeches have become desperately bombastic, his arguments increasingly unbelievable, and his tactics more worrisomely gangsterish. In the arrogance of his first hundred days, he showed no willingness to develop genuine bipartisan solutions; now he’s stuck with a party, half of whose members think he’s too radical, and half who don’t think he’s radical enough.

We are a strong and enduring nation - but just how many Carters can we stand in one human lifetime?


That's a spot-on observation.  Will the word 'flailing' start to be applied soon to this spoiled brat by some pundits?  Probably, but I would warn: don't underestimate what this man is willing to do to achieve his ends.  He is a classic Leftist and that means he subscribes, like Lenin, to the belief that his goals, because they are part of THE ANSWER, must be achieved 'by any means necessary'.  He is committed to his utopian vision and will not allow anyone to stand athwart him yelling 'Stop!'.  I've studied Leftism and Leftists for most of my life and I can tell you he ranks up there with the most famous of them.

If a strong opposition continues to plague him, our beloved Tiberius, like the real Tiberius, may descend into paranoia.  My question: who will end up being his Sejanus?

One quibble with my friend Paco: Our beloved Tiberius is much worse than Carter in that he is more strong-willed and is deeply committed to immanentizing the eschaton.

*Pliny The Elder [the gloomiest of men]
22 jul 09 @ 10:54 am edt          Comments

MARY JO KOPECHNE COULD NOT BE REACHED FOR COMMENT II
Over at AmSpecBlog, Quin Hillyer has posted what I think it the definitive statement about Ted Kennedy.  He was prompted by the 40th Anniversary of death of Mary Jo Kopechne this past weekend due to the criminal negligence of the Senior Senator from Massachusetts.  A highlight:

While Miss Kopechne may well still have been alive, this man, this senator, walked past four houses without asking for help, returned to a guest cottage and did not call for help, went back to his hotel and went to sleep, awoke, showered, hung out on a hotel balcony with the winners of a regatta, chatting pleasantly, and then took the ferry back to Chappaquiddick, ignoring aides' advice to report the incident, making numerous phone calls to others but still not reporting the incident.... and he still suffered no legal ramifications worth talking about, still stayed in office, and still had the appalling viciousness to slander Judge Robert Bork, smear all sorts of other Republicans, accuse President Bush of bribing foreign leaders, bent every rule of decency in his treatment of his ideological adversaries, set up sham investigations of judicial nominees, and in essence spent a whole career doing horrible things that only he could get away with, meanwhile seriously eroding our level of public discourse and of conduct in office (not to mention his awful private conduct for another two decades at least after Chappaquiddick).

Bravo Quin!

Please take the time to click here and read his full posting.

Also, please click on the link that follows to read my take on Edward Moore Kennedy and his whole %$@#& Family [I'm having trouble getting the link feature to work properly—its been that kind of week here at TCOTS]:

http://www.thecampofthesaints.com/2009.07.19_arch.html#1248134895473
22 jul 09 @ 10:26 am edt          Comments

IG-GATE: 'Hear That Train A Comin' Edition
I've added eight  ten new links already today to the IG-GATE part of the UNWELCOME DISTRACTIONS Section of the WWU-AM Page just now. 

This sucker's picking up speed.

From Ed O'Keefe's Federal Eye blog this morning over at The Washington Post, we learn:

Rep. Edolphus Towns (D-N.Y.) said his Oversight and Government Reform Committee would suspend its investigation into the firing of Gerald Walpin, the former inspector general at the Corporation for National and Community Service, since the former watchdog filed suit against the agency last Friday in federal court.

"We have met with White House staff and interviewed staff at the Corporation for National and Community Service, and Democratic and Republican board members, and have reviewed hundreds of pages of documents," Towns said in a statement. "This evidence shows that the Corporation board’s report expressing concerns about Mr. Walpin’s performance was fact-based, unanimous, and nonpartisan." Towns said President Obama had "legitimate reasons for removing Mr. Walpin."

The panel will however look into the firing of Judith Gwynn, who was
removed as ITC's inspector general in June. It also continues to investigate the unexpected retirement of Amtrak's inspector general, who left the rail company on the same day he submitted a report about potential interference with his investigations.

Senator Charles Grassley is proposing the creation of an Inspector-General-in-Chief in a posting over at Politico.

In a posting last night over at The Other McCain, intrepid reporter Stacy McCain wrote:

...There's a lot of stuff out there, in other words, and you need to see it all if you want to try to understand this thing.

"Try," I say, because I don't even claim to understand it all yet. My sources talk about things and sometimes I can tell they're trying to drop me a hint of something they want me to write about, e.g., "Who Is Eleanor Acheson?" It's important to ask the right questions, as one of my sources said.

On the one hand, there is the temptation to focus on one aspect of the story -- the Washington Times keeps calling this "WalpinGate," which is too narrow -- but on the other hand, you've got to be careful not to waste time playing "connect-the-dots" with things that might not really be connected. Yes, there's a pattern, but that doesn't mean there's a conspiracy.

He was also kind enough to mention my ongoing aggregation over at the UNWELCOME DISTRACTIONS Section of the WWU-AM Page.  This copy boy thanks you Mr. Gatlin.

Keep checking back at WWU-AM for the latest on this Scandal Train as it keeps a rollin'.

WWU-AM — WE WARNED YOU, AMERICA
22 jul 09 @ 8:24 am edt          Comments

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

UPDATES TO THE WWU-AM PAGE TODAY
Outside of the ten new links added to the IG-GATE part of the UNWELCOME DISTRACTIONS Section, I've added the following today to the WWU-AM page...

-THE WAR OF THE WORLDS = 3

-THE OUTFIT TRANSCRIPTS = 1

-JUST THE FACTS, MAM = 11 Total [7 for health care / 4 various]
21 jul 09 @ 8:15 pm edt          Comments

IG-GATE: Fight Back Edition
I've added a total of ten new links today to the IG-GATE part of the UNWELCOME DISTRACTIONS Section of the WWU-AM Page.

Two of them I just posted: one is the latest from Stacy McCain and the other is from an exclusive that Gerald Walpin gave to The Washington Times.  Here's a highlight:

"For a second I was thinking, 'Why do I need all of this?' I'll just resign and go back to my good legal practice in New York," inspector general Gerald Walpin told The Washington Times America's Morning News radio news show on Tuesday.

"But I would then be part of the apparatus that is totally torpedoing the inspectors general," Mr. Walpin continued. "The watchdog would not really be a watchdog. He'd just be afraid of his shadow."


Keep checking back at WWU-AM for the latest on this wide-ranging Scandal.

WWU-AM — WE WARNED YOU, AMERICA
21 jul 09 @ 7:55 pm edt          Comments

SHAMELESS BW

Doug Ross [Director Blue] has published two very interesting postings lately...

1) Somehow the man has gotten ahold of some of the questions that have been submitted to Al-Qaeda's #2 Ayman Zawahiri on his website and that he has vowed to eventually answer.  Here's two of them:

Dear Mr. Doctor Zawahiri,

If your group happens to gain access to a nuclear weapon and detonate it in a western country, would you be so kind as to purchase some carbon offsets to make up for any thermonuclear warming that might endanger our snowcaps? Please visit PimpMyOffsets.com or call +1-888-555-GORE, toll-free, for more information. Thanks for your support in helping keep the world a greener place,

A. Gore, Belle Meade, TN

* * *

Dear Dr. Zawahiri,

How can I help?

Sincerely, Keith O., NYC

Please take the time to click here and read the rest.

2) Mr. Ross is truly an amazing man—he's now outdone himself: somehow, someway he's gotten his hands on a government newsreel from the near future!  He's got stills and the transcript.  A highlight from the narration:

And more positive news on the economic front: the rate of unemployment increases has slowed, moving from 17.1% to 17.4%, a tenth-of-a-percent less than analysts had predicted! Proof positive that Stimulus Seven is working!

What a man is this Ross-fellow.  Please click here to see and read the whole amazing thing. [tip of the fedora to Instapundit, who's also an amazing (and generous) man]

21 jul 09 @ 7:16 pm edt          Comments

'EVERYTHING WENT JUST AS PLANNED'

Over at Paco Enterprises, we're being treated to another installment in the saga of Detective Paco.  A taste:

“Take a look, Bo. What’s that big object on the bow that looks like a deck house or a port-a-potty?”

Bo squinted through the lenses. “Naw, that ain’t no deck house. That’s Al Gore. He’s taken to wearin’ a white uniform; got his crew wearin’ ‘em, too. And he changed the name of his boat from the Bio-Solar One to the Koenigen Luisa. Puttin’ on a lotta airs, is what he’s doin’.”

“Say!” Wronwright snapped his fingers. “The Koenigen Luisa. Wasn’t that the name of the warship in that movie…what’s the name?”

The African Queen,” I said. “The Koenigen Luisa was the German ship that patrolled the lake.”

Bo brightened considerably. “Hey, I saw that one! Got sunk by a homemade torpedo, I recollect. That’s a possibility, ain’t it, Detective Paco?”

I pulled a coffin nail from the pack in my shirt pocket and lit it. “Listen, Bo. In the first place, if we torpedo the boat, somebody’s likely to get hurt, maybe even killed. In the second place, where would we get a torpedo, anyway? No, we’ve got to figure something else out.”


Do yourself a favor Clyde and take a short hop over to Paco's.  When ya get there take a gander at the rest of the story.

21 jul 09 @ 6:56 pm edt          Comments

OBAMCARE: WHERE TO GO FOR THE BEST INFO [Updated below]

What is collectively being called Obamacare is one of the most complex pieces of legislation ever proposed on the national level.  There are so many nooks and crannies within it that even a single expert person, let alone us regular folk, would have trouble understanding it all.  While there are a number of experts in this area that we can rely upon [such as Keith Hennessey, Sally Pipes, Warner Todd Huston, and John Graham, to name but four of the best] to provide us with useful analysis and explanations, this is still not good enough.  Most of us average folk who are working hard to keep our jobs and raise our families don't have the time to bounce from website to website and sift through the mounds of background and analysis being provided.  We need the aggregators—those willing to look at it all, cull the best  and most useful of them, and then provide us with descriptions, commentary, and links.  Thankfully, there are a number of these types on the conservative side who are doing yeoman's work.

Out of them all, Pundette of Pundit & Pundette, in my opinion, is the best.  She's been out there slaving away, searching through much and distilling the best.

Here's an excerpt from a recent posting of her's entitled: Beyond Rationing: Controlling More Than Health:

Imagining your own or a loved one's fate in the hands of bureaucrats and "experts" is horrifying. Read this WSJ article about NICE, the UK board that decides who is and who is not worthy of particular drugs and treatments. They've made some very bad medical decisions because their decisions are based on cost and "there is a limited pot of money." Examples: rationing of medicine to treat macular degeneration, which causes blindness, to one in five, and for only one eye, because "When treatments are very expensive, we have to use them where they give the most benefit to patients." The board ruled to refuse treatment of early Alzheimer's with Aricept though the drug is most effective when taken at the onset of dementia. The article gives more examples of the board going against best medical practice.

Here's some links to more of her recent postings:

-Obama v America on health care reform

-Rush: Obama lying on health care changes

-What's really in the Obamacare bills

-Kyl on Obamacare

Please visit Pundit & Pundette often for the latest on the attempts to socialize and destroy the American Health Care System.

In the first posting of Pundette's I linked to above, she provides a link to and a quote from an op-ed by Betsy McCaughey in the New York Post:

There's plenty of waste in Medicare, but the Congressional Budget Office estimates only 1 percent of the savings under the legislation will be from curbing waste, fraud and abuse. That means the rest will likely come from reducing what patients get.

One troubling provision of the House bill compels seniors to submit to a counseling session every five years (and more often if they become sick or go into a nursing home) about alternatives for end-of-life care (House bill, p. 425-430). The sessions cover highly sensitive matters such as whether to receive antibiotics and "the use of artificially administered nutrition and hydration."

This mandate invites abuse, and seniors could easily be pushed to refuse care. Do we really want government involved in such deeply personal issues?


Another link Pundette provided recently is to this spot-on editorial by the Editors of Investor's Business Daily:

What wasn't known until now is that the bill itself will kill the market for private individual coverage by not letting any new policies be written after the public option becomes law.

The legislation is also likely to finish off health savings accounts, a goal that Democrats have had for years. They want to crush that alternative because nothing gives individuals more control over their medical care, and the government less, than HSAs.

With HSAs out of the way, a key obstacle to the left's expansion of the welfare state will be removed.

The public option won't be an option for many, but rather a mandate for buying government care. A free people should be outraged at this advance of soft tyranny.


My only quibble: I think it should be called 'Stealth Tyranny'.

Literally, our lives, and those of our families and all Americans, are on the line here.

OBAMACARE DELANDA EST!

SIDENOTE: Please also keep visiting the special section [Socializing Health Care] I've set up in the JUST THE FACTS, MAM part of the WWU-AMpage.  There I provide permanent links to background and analysis on this issue.  After, visiting Pundette, make your next stop JUST THE FACTS, MAM.

UPDATE: I've just added seven new permanent links on the Socialization of our Heath Care System over at JUST THE FACTS, MAMThis one is the most important.

21 jul 09 @ 2:42 pm edt          Comments

IG-GATE: Protection Edition
I just added four new links to the IG-GATE part of the UNWELCOME DISTRACTIONS Section of the WWU-AM Page.

One of those is from a posting by Jake Tapper over at ABC News.  A highlight:

Gerald Walpin, the man who President Obama fired last month as Inspector General of the Corporation for National and Community Service, will issue the following statement this morning, a few days after filing a lawsuit seeking reinstatement to his job.

"I am bringing this lawsuit primarily to protect the system of Inspectors General, which cannot remain viable without insulation from  political and other interference," Walpin will say in the statement. "While I also am troubled at the mud-slinging lengths those who sought my removal have gone to attempt, belatedly, to rationalize their actions, the most important objective of this lawsuit is to prevent a successful illegal removal of one Inspector General from being used as a precedent for other similar interferences and the chilling effect that it would have on the willingness of other Inspectors General effectively to perform their job when faced with proceeding against friends of people in high places."

Please take the time to click here and read the full report.

Keep checking back at WWU-AM for the latest on this wide-ranging Scandal.

WWU-AM — WE WARNED YOU, AMERICA
21 jul 09 @ 9:53 am edt          Comments

BELVEDERE HANDCUFFED TO THE RADIATOR
My daytime ISP is still experiencing some proxy problems, but not as bad as yesterday, so we'll see how it goes..
21 jul 09 @ 9:07 am edt          Comments

Monday, July 20, 2009

IG-GATE: Late Edition
I just added three new links to the five new links added earlier today to the IG-GATE part of the UNWELCOME DISTRACTIONS Section of the WWU-AM Page.

Keep checking back at WWU-AM for the latest on this wide-ranging Scandal.

WWU-AM — WE WARNED YOU, AMERICA
20 jul 09 @ 8:47 pm edt          Comments

STEYN OF THE WEEKEND
From his most recent appearance on the Hugh Hewitt Show, Mark Larson guest hosting:

LARSON:Obviously, Joe Biden wasn’t working with a teleprompter today. Is this an indication about some chaos, some fraying of the fabric if you will, behind the scenes at the Obama White House? Because obviously he’s on the ropes on health care, cap and trade, cap and tax doesn’t look like a slam dunk now at the next phase, either. So what’s really happening? They’re going to get Sotomayor, they’ve got the number of votes, but is something else crumbling?

STEYN: I think his plan was to throw all the spaghetti at the wall in the first few weeks of the administration. And it would simply prove impossible for people to keep track of it. You know, one week it’s the bailout, one week it’s the stimulus, one week it’s cap and trade, one week it’s health care. And you just, it would be impossible to keep track of all this. And the net result after six months is all this stuff would be a done deal, and it would be impossible to object to it. But people are beginning to figure out that what all this complicated stuff has in common is a huge price tag. And once you know that, you don’t have to know all the details to object to it. And so I think that common denominator, the fact that it’s essentially unaffordable without taxing the life out of the United States, I think that message is getting through, and is beginning to stick to the President personally.

Let us pray.

Please take the time to click here and read the full transcript.
20 jul 09 @ 8:41 pm edt          Comments

WHY WE FIGHT
A story like this reminds us why we must fight and win the War Against Islam, and deal them such a blow that they will not recover for another 500 years...

From The Jerusalem Post, Sabina Amidi reporting:

In a shocking and unprecedented interview, directly exposing the inhumanity of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's religious regime in Iran, a serving member of the paramilitary Basiji militia has told this reporter of his role in suppressing opposition street protests in recent weeks.

He has also detailed aspects of his earlier service in the force, including his enforced participation in the rape of young Iranian girls prior to their execution.

...

Explaining how he had come to join the volunteer Basiji forces, he said his mother had taken him to them.

When he was 16, "my mother took me to a Basiji station and begged them to take me under their wing because I had no one and nothing foreseeable in my future. My father was martyred during the war in Iraq and she did not want me to get hooked on drugs and become a street thug. I had no choice," he said.

He said he had been a highly regarded member of the force, and had so "impressed my superiors" that, at 18, "I was given the 'honor' to temporarily marry young girls before they were sentenced to death."

In the Islamic Republic it is illegal to execute a young woman, regardless of her crime, if she is a virgin, he explained. Therefore a "wedding" ceremony is conducted the night before the execution: The young girl is forced to have sexual intercourse with a prison guard - essentially raped by her "husband."

"I regret that, even though the marriages were legal," he said.

Why the regret, if the marriages were "legal?"

"Because," he went on, "I could tell that the girls were more afraid of their 'wedding' night than of the execution that awaited them in the morning. And they would always fight back, so we would have to put sleeping pills in their food. By morning the girls would have an empty expression; it seemed like they were ready or wanted to die.

"I remember hearing them cry and scream after [the rape] was over," he said. "I will never forget how this one girl clawed at her own face and neck with her finger nails afterwards. She had deep scratches all over her."

And you want to negotiate on an equal footing with this barbaric regime Mr. President?  A regime that condones the violent wrenching away of the dignity of young virginal women who will soon be executed.?  A regime that can do this?
IranianStudentBeaten560.jpg
A regime that can condone and encourage this?
Neda.jpg
Have you no decency Mr. President?...foolish me...stupid question....

[tip of the fedora to Mark Steyn: 'Must be convenient to have a legal code that obliges all your pathologies.']
20 jul 09 @ 8:31 pm edt          Comments

MARY JO KOPECHNE COULD NOT BE REACHED FOR COMMENT

This past Saturday was the 40th Anniversary of the death at Chappaquiddick of Mary Jo Kopechne due to the negligence of one Edward Moore Kennedy.  He never paid for the crime because he paid enough for it to go away, and he took advantage of the pity Americans felt for his family and lied in a televised broadcast.  Those of us who believe in justice can only take heart in the fact that he will have to answer for his sins once he dies.

The Blogprof has provided is with a top-notch commemoration of the event over at his site.  As he comments: 'The Democrat party ought to be proud!'.

Please take the time to click here and view his full posting.  [tip of the fedora to Stacy McCain]

My greatest hope is that, once the Senator dies, Americans will wake up and say 'Enough with this wretched family!  Go away and 'serve the public' no more!'  As I wrote in a Dispatch here on 16 December 2008 when it seemed Princess Caroline Kennedy-Schlossberg was going to be appointed Senator:

My main objection to her appointment is the belief that seems to infect all Kennedys: that they are entitled to public offices.  There's an arrogance about them that, along with a sense of entitlement, makes my republican blood boil.  [I wish they would all, every single one of them, go away; they've done enough damage.]

20 jul 09 @ 8:08 pm edt          Comments

WHAT GIVES?
Michelle Malkin has been following the case of captured soldier Pfc. Bowe Bergdahl, who you may have seen in a video released by the Taliban in the past twenty-four hours.

The evidence is mounting that he may have deserted.

Mrs. Malkin has been working this story like the great investigator she is.   She has looked at the three possible scenarios that have been put forward and lays out the evidence she has unearthed.

Please take the time to click here and read her full posting which has been updated several times over the course of today.

At one point in it, she quotes from a posting by True/Slantreporter P.J. Tobia.  A highlight from his blog entry:

I’ve been reporting for over a week(along with the AP and WaPo) that Bowe Bergdahl, the US soldier who’s gone missing in eastern Afghanistan, walked off the base on his own accord.

Now, somebody close to the people searching for Bergdahl has repeated this assertion saying that the soldier left “a note behind that said he was going to the mountains to find himself. He took a journal and 4 or 5 knives with him.” My source tells me that Bergdahl arrived at a village and asked if anybody spoke English. That’s when he was captured.

My source tells me that there is no doubt Bergdahl deserted, which in a time of war is punishable by a court martial at the least, or even execution.

I’m not the only one saying this. Lt. Col. 
Ralph Peters(Ret.) told Fox News that Bergdahl is  “an apparent deserter,” and intimates that he wouldn’t feel badly if the Taliban killed Bergdahl. At the end of the segment he does say that we should wait until all the facts come in to pass judgement, but even Michelle Malkin smells something fishy.

Is Pfc. Bergdahl being used as a dupe?  Or has he joined with the Taliban?  Or is he suffering from some kind of mental breakdown [trying to 'find himself']?  One thing that seems clear so far: he is no hero.  And quite possibly he has disgraced the uniform.
20 jul 09 @ 7:43 pm edt          Comments

BELVEDERE UNLOCKED AND FREED
I am now operating off my night ISP and I should be able to post with no problems.  Apologies for this morning and afternoon, and thank you all for your indulgence.

Another IG-Gate update is coming, plus other stuff.
20 jul 09 @ 7:24 pm edt          Comments

AND THAT'S THE WAY IT WASN'T

I generally let some time pass before I speak ill of the dead, but in this case, before the mythologizing gets too out of hand and set in stone, I feel compelled to release the following into the ether...

RE: Walter Cronkite

He was indeed one of the most trusted men in America for two decades.  He was aware of this and he abused that trust in a most shameless and dishonorable way by slanting his coverage of important events by editing them to fit his Leftist point of view.

He had a presence like a General Galvin—oozing authority and commanding respect.  We allowed him the privilege to be our news-editor-in-chief, and he abused the privilege.  Yes, we deserve some of the blame for allowing him to get away with it for so long, but we Americans were a less skeptical and cynical people back then [we younger ones, at least, wised-up in the late 1970's and early 1980's because we had been through some very disheartening times at an impressionable age].

His bringing of his Leftist biases into his news reading and reporting only served us well when it came to the space program.  And this was just a mere happy confluence.

The lionizing of him in death has already begun.  The MSM [and, sadly, with Fox News Channel as fellow travellers] are building a figurative grand statute of him.  We must be prepared to topple it at the first opportunity.  Getting to it will not be easy, but, once we can break through the barriers, it will be easy as it is a statute made of sand.

May the man rest in peace in the arms of The Lord.  May the myth burn away.

Paco has up a some spot-on personal recollections of Mr. Cronkite.  A highlight:

He was one of the gravediggers of Vietnam, a key member of that band of journalists and opinion-mongers who turned the Tet offensive from what it actually was – a crushing defeat for the Communist guerillas, that permanently destroyed the Viet Cong as an effective fighting force – into a defeat for U.S. and South Vietnamese military forces. Cronkite helped the Communists snatch victory from the jaws of defeat by contributing to a massive shift in public opinion in the U.S. that eventually led our government to abandon Southeast Asia to the inevitable bloodbath.

Please take the time to click here and read his full posting.

20 jul 09 @ 2:35 pm edt          Comments

UPDATE to BELVEDERE IN CHAINS
UPDATE @1343hrs:  My ISP now is hopping around on one leg, so I will try to update WWU-AM and post here what I was going to post this morning.  Wish me luck.
20 jul 09 @ 1:52 pm edt          Comments

BELVEDERE IN CHAINS
My ISP is experiencing some major congestion problems this morning.  I have been trying to post since 0830 hours without much luck.  The previous posting on IG-Gate mentions five new links I was intending to add to the UNWELCOME DISTRACTIONS Section of the WWU-AM Page.

I am unable, at this time, to post anything over at WWU-AM, so here are four of the links for now:

http://spectator.org/archives/2009/07/20/behind-closed-doors

http://www.washingtontimes.com/weblogs/watercooler/2009/jul/17/more-walpin-gate-lawsuit/

http://newledger.com/2009/07/remember-gerald-walpin/


http://rsmccain.blogspot.com/2009/07/ig-gate-behind-closed-doors.html


I am assured full service will be restored by this afternoon.  I apologize for the inconvenience.
20 jul 09 @ 10:31 am edt          Comments

IG-GATE: 'When We Get Behind Closed Doors' Edition
I just added five new links to IG-GATE part of the UNWELCOME DISTRACTIONS Section of the WWU-AM Page.

The plot thickens...Robert Stacy McCain has filed his latest report over at The American Spectator.  Here is a highlight:

Win or lose, the Walpin lawsuit definitely adds a new angle to the story, primarily through the legal process known as "discovery," whereby the defendants can be required to disclose…well, just about anything, really. If there is some document that the plaintiff can convince a judge is relevant to the case, the defendants will be ordered to hand it over, and then there are the sworn depositions. These requirements expose the defendants to legal jeopardy -- for perjury, obstruction of justice and other such "process crimes" -- if they don't fully and honestly cooperate.

If all this sounds vaguely familiar, perhaps the reader is recalling a lawsuit, Jones v. Clinton, which led to the momentous deposition in which the defendant, William Jefferson Clinton, committed perjury about "that woman, Miss Lewinsky."

Of course, as Americans were lectured for months on end, "everybody lies about sex," but does everybody lie about firing a government watchdog whose job is to keep an eye out for "waste, fraud and abuse" in federal agencies?


Please take the time to click here and read the full report.

The casting of the movie version of IG-Gate proceeds apace.  The word out of Tinsletown is that Christina Hendricks has been cast as Stacy McCain's main source 'Deep Cleavage'.  My sources tell me that casting may be complete for all of the major roles by the end of the week.  When that happens, you'll see it here first.

Stacy-McCain-Reporter-30-.jpg

Keep checking back at WWU-AM for the latest on this wide-ranging Scandal.

WWU-AM — WE WARNED YOU, AMERICA
20 jul 09 @ 10:15 am edt          Comments

Sunday, July 19, 2009

ONWARD TO GREATER GLORY...
BREAKING...

On or around 1500 hours ET this afternoon, The Other McCain passed the two million visitor mark.

Congratulations to Stacy McCain and Smitty.

You both do fine work and deserve any praise that comes your way.

Both men have been very kind with their time, advice, and linkage to your grateful Dispatcher and to many others.

Well done, good and faithful servants of The Republic, well done.

Onward to three million!

Please take the time to click here and join in the celebrations.
19 jul 09 @ 7:12 pm edt          Comments

IG-GATE: 'The Man' Edition
I just added four new links to IG-GATE part of the UNWELCOME DISTRACTIONS Section of the WWU-AM Page.

Robert Stacy McCain was out Friday doing what real reporters do and he filed another diary entry of his efforts.  A highlight:

My first visit was to an office where Smith at the desk smiled when he saw me walk in the door. He went into the next room to announce my arrival and, without saying a word, I walked right in behind him. I saw the initial look of horror on the source's face when Smith said I was back, but then the source saw me behind Smith and smiled: "Oh, hi, Stacy!"

Nothing beats shoe leather. What I wanted from this source was to confirm the name and office location of the guy who hadn't responded to my e-mail the day before. (Hint to public servants: When I send you an e-mail saying "call me at [my personal cell phone number] at your earliest opportunity," you should RSVP ASAP.)

So I got the information and added a little extra hassle for good measure. This particular source is also a friend. If your friendly sources object to journalistic harassment, what kind of friends are they?

Please take the time to click here and read the full entry.

Over at The Sundries Shack, Jimmie Bise comments on the lawsuit filed by fired IG Gerald Walpin:

Ed Morrissey doesn't think Walpin has a chance of getting his job back. I disagree only because it seems that Walpin's firing blatantly violated the law the President pushed so hard to get passed when he was a Senator. The government could stall for a while but I have a hard time believing that with so many other things on the President's plate (and a not particularly competent gaggle of underlings), he's going to pay this case a lot of attention until it's too late....

Please take the time to click here and read the rest of his posting.

Keep checking back at WWU-AM for the latest on this wide-ranging Scandal.

WWU-AM — WE WARNED YOU, AMERICA

If you missed it, click here to see how even Hollywood finds this story interesting.
19 jul 09 @ 7:04 pm edt          Comments


Archive Newer | Older

Dispatches are archived by week; click on the links above.



Wolverines-Logo-370.jpg

'This one was worth the fight.
And it's only one fight in the battle, and we have to keep fighting.'

—Doug Hoffman


The Restoration will not be televised; it will be blogged.
—Robert Belvedere


IG-Gate-LinkLogo.jpg
Click The Picture Above For The Latest Updates/Linkage

'Bob Belvedere may have the best compilationof IG-Gate information.'
Robert Stacy McCain

'Robert Belvedere at The Camp of the Saints appears to be maintaining the definitive index of all things PIG-gate...at TCOTS. ...This is an excellent resource. We thank you, sir.'
Smitty

'More great commentary and juicy links on l'affaire IG from Camp of the Saints..'
Paco


Czar-dOz-342.jpg


Obama-CYL-Flag-342.jpg



- DETECTIVE PACO in -
Dectective-Paco-Sm-342.jpg

Part 1  ◊  Part 2  ◊  Part 3

WAITING FOR O-DOUGH
by Christopher L. Smith

An Adaptation of the Modern Masterpiece

Characters / Critics
♦ Act I
♦ Act II

OediPOTUS Wrecks
by Christopher L. Smith
An Adaptation of the Classic Play

♦ Characters / Critics
♦ Prologue
♦ Scene I
♦ Scene II
♦ Scene III
♦ Finale


Captain Ohab:
'From hell's heart I stab at thee; for hate's sake I spit my last breath at thee. Ye damned Fox News.'

Dont-Tread-On-Me-240.jpg
Israeli-Gadsden-Flag-300.jpg
Taiwan-Flag-300b.jpg

I may be reached at
Robert.Belvedere AT gmail DOT com


FELLOW DHS-CERTIFIED
RIGHT-WING EXTREMISTS
- The Other McCain -
-
The Corner at NRO -
-
Mark Steyn Online -
- Quin Hillyer -
-
AmSpecBlog -
-
Victor Davis Hanson -
-
Red State -
-
Powerline -
-
Michael Ledeen -
-
Contentions -
-
Rachel Lucas -
- John Derbyshire -
- Vlad Tepes -
- Michelle Malkin -
- Pundit & Pundette -
- JammieWearingFool -
- Monique Stuart -
- Josh Painter -
- The Sundries Shack -
- Paco Enterprises -
- The Classic Liberal -
- American Power -
- Piece Of Work In Progress -
- The Pirate's Cove -
- Eye Of Polyphemus -
- Atlas Shrugs -
- No Sheeples Here -
- And So It Goes In Shreveport -
- Troglopundit -
- Ann Coulter -
- The Gormogons -
- WyBlog -
- Riehl World View -
- Caught Him With A Corndog -
- An Ol' Broad's Ramblings -
- Liberty Belle -
- Another Black Conservative -
- Common Cents -
- Jaded Haven -
- Cassy Fiano -
- TOTUS -
- Soylent Green -
- In Mala Fide -
- My Voice On The Wings Of Change -
- What Would The Founding Fathers Do -
- Washington Rebel -


LEST WE FORGET...
CoastGuardAnniversary-17900804.jpg
04 AUGUST 1790: The Founding of the U.S. Coast Guard


NotOneRedCentBlogAdSmall.jpg
Please click on the image and visit the site.

Please click here to read
Behind the ‘Not One Red Cent’ Rebellion
by ROBERT STACY MCCAIN


IR5BF2009-Banner74.jpg

OffendAFeminist.jpg

WHAT IS A TRILLION?
[tip of the fedora to Jonah Goldberg]

Click here and here to find out why I think
Robert Stacy McCain is
THE CONSERVATIVE SHAFT


NTCNewsLogo01a.jpg


DenouncedBy-TVV.jpg

MY KENYAN BIRTH CERTIFICATE
Robert-Belvedere-Kenyan-Birth-Certificate-180.jpg
Please Click on the Image to View Full Size
Michelle-Malkin-Culture-Of-Corruption.jpg
GOP_CapAndTax8.jpg
Please click on the image above to learn more from Michelle Malkin.
Pavlik-Morozov-Award-Paco.jpg

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

T E R M S

Let us make precise and clear-cut the terms we should be using.

Aristotle wrote that A is A; you may also call it B, but it always remains A. A thing is what it is and, to say it is something else, is to deny reality. There is a lot of denial of reality going around these days.

As John Adams wrote: 'Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence'.

POINT 1:  There is no "War in Iraq" or "War in Afghanistan".  Like the Pacific and Europe in World War II, Iraq and Afghanistan are just parts of a larger war.  Unlike them, they are not separate from each other.  Therefore, they are part of the Middle East Theatre of Operations [METO] as the Pacific was the PTO and Europe the ETO.

POINT 2: Many on the Left and some on the Right want to "end the War".  There are only two ways to end a war: (1) by achieving Victory or (2) by being Defeated.  A pullout, before Victory is achieved, is Defeat.  They want Defeat.  Pullout may be the best policy―I am not arguing that here―but, leaving without achieving our objective is Defeat.

POINT 3: We are engaged in a War Against Islam.  The term is more correct than "War against Islamo-Fascism" or "War On Terror". 

Islam has been at war with all non-Muslims since the time of its founder, Muhammad [his name be cursed].  Like the Hundred Years' War, there have been periods of peace in this long conflict, but the Muslim has never stopped believing that he is at war with all non-Muslims.  He can't: Allah commands that all of the world be conquered in his name and he must submit, in all things, to the will of Allah [the word Islam means "submission", sometimes rendered as "surrender"].  Any periods of peace we in the West have enjoyed have only occurred after we have dealt them such a devastating blow that they have not been able to wage their jihad and then have pursued polices that have kept them subjugated.  This began to fade in the latter half of the 20th Century as we forgot the dangers posed by this militant religion and as they regrouped under new and committed leaders.

If you doubt that Islam is at war with all non-Muslims, keep in mind this:
Islamic apologists often point out that Islam is not a monolith and that there are differences of opinion among the different Islamic schools of thought. That is true, but, while there are differences, there are also common elements. Just as Orthodox, Roman Catholic, and Protestant Christians differ on many aspects of Christianity, still they accept important common elements. So it is with Islam. One of the common elements to all Islamic schools of thought is jihad, understood as the obligation of the Ummah to conquer and subdue the world in the name of Allah and rule it under Sharia law. The four Sunni Madhhabs (schools of fiqh [Islamic religious jurisprudence]) -- Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hanbali -- all agree that there is a collective obligation on Muslims to make war on the rest of the world. Furthermore, even the schools of thought outside Sunni orthodoxy, including Sufism and the Jafari (Shia) school, agree on the necessity of jihad. When it comes to matters of jihad, the different schools disagree on such questions as whether infidels must first be asked to convert to Islam before hostilities may begin (Osama bin Laden asked America to convert before Al-Qaeda’s attacks); how plunder should be distributed among victorious jihadists; whether a long-term Fabian strategy against dar al-harb is preferable to an all-out frontal attack; etc.

[Source: Gregory M. Davis, Islam 101, section 4g, found at http://www.jihadwatch.org/islam101/]

They have been at war with us for centuries and we, therefore, have been at war with them.  We are engaged in a War Against Islam whether we want to say so or not.  In an interview with a Pakistani TV network on 23 July 2008, Mustafa Abu Al-Yazid, Al-Qaeda's No. 3 man and top commander in Afghanistan, has this to say: “Islam does not distinguish between the American people and the American government, since both are in a state of war with Islam”.

[Source: http://www.memri.org/bin/latestnews.cgi?ID=SD200008]

POINT 4: The term "Islamo-Fascism" seems to have been created by Leftists.  Since (1) they wrongly place fascism on the Right, (2) they believe [rightly] Muslims want to establish a theocratic regime on Earth, and (3) anything political that has any connection with religion is bad and emanates out of rightwing thinking, the term makes sense to them.  Therefore, the term is nothing but a way to associate Islam with the right-wing.  Muslims believe in a totalitarian way of governing; in submission [that word] to an all-powerful Islamic leader or leaders.

POINT 5: As to the term "War On Terror", it is just plain silly: how can you wage war on a thing?

POINT 6: What is fascism?  It is when a government allows private property to exist, but controls and manages the use and disposal of property in all its forms.  Citizens retain all of the burdens and responsibilities associated with property ownership, but are not allowed to control and shape its use.

As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. The word derives from fasces, the Roman symbol of collectivism and power: a tied bundle of rods with a protruding ax. In its day (the 1920s and 1930s), fascism was seen as the happy medium between boom-and-bust-prone liberal capitalism, with its alleged class conflict, wasteful competition, and profit-oriented egoism, and revolutionary Marxism, with its violent and socially divisive persecution of the bourgeoisie. Fascism substituted the particularity of nationalism and racialism—“blood and soil”—for the internationalism of both classical liberalism and Marxism.

Where socialism sought totalitarian control of a society’s economic processes through direct state operation of the means of production, fascism sought that control indirectly, through domination of nominally private owners. Where socialism nationalized property explicitly, fascism did so implicitly, by requiring owners to use their property in the “national interest”—that is, as the autocratic authority conceived it. (Nevertheless, a few industries were operated by the state.) Where socialism abolished all market relations outright, fascism left the appearance of market relations while planning all economic activities. Where socialism abolished money and prices, fascism controlled the monetary system and set all prices and wages politically. In doing all this, fascism denatured the marketplace. Entrepreneurship was abolished. State ministries, rather than consumers, determined what was produced and under what conditions.
[Source: Sheldon Richman, The Concise Encylcopedia Of Economics, Liberty Fund, found at http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Fascism.html]

On the political spectrum, therefore, it is located between modern liberalism and socialism.

POINT 7: What is socialism?  It is when a government allows no private property to exist, and controls and manages the use and disposal of property in all its forms.  Citizens are not allowed to control their lives and are subject to the whims of bureaucrats and officials.  If they retain freedoms and liberties, they do so at the discretion of them.   On the political spectrum, therefore, it is the next logical stage after fascism; some would argue that it lies between fascism and communism.

POINT 8: What is pragmatism?  It is a tool used by Leftists, or those operating under the influence of Leftist logic, to achieve Utopian ends—heaven on earth through social, political, cultural, and spiritual engineering.  It is merely a tool of ideology, part of the means to an end.

POINT 9:The Big Lie - When confronted with truths that reflect unpleasantly on them, the Leftists deflect it buy claiming over-an-over ad nauseum that these truths apply to and are products of the Right.  This practice is known as The Big Lie.  It has been successfully practiced by the Left since, at the very least, the French Revolution.  Thus, we have the now-widespread belief that the Nazis and the Black Shirts of Italy were right-wingers when the reality-the truth-is they were both people of the Left.  I suspect the violent objections from the Left to conservatives use of the term 'fascist' arise from the fact that they have spent well over seventy years trying to convince the world of The Big Lie that it is not and never has been a Leftist ideology.

How does one practice this distortion truth and why is it effective?  In a report issued during World War II by the OSS, the author provided an explanation for all practitioners by describing how Hitler practiced it:

His primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it.

By repeating their lies over and over, the Left creates a false reality that supplements the real world.  In this false reality, the lie is the truth, the truth is the lie.  A is not A.  [But we know that A must always be A.]

The Left also practices a variation of The Big Lie that I like to call The Big Deception which involves a Big Deflection away from the reality of the situation.  None of their policies or actions can survive direct questioning, so the Leftists must turn the tables on the questioners and make it seem as though the inquisitors have bad or evil intentions. Overtime and after constant and unrelenting hectoring, the Left's way of thinking triumphs.  They successfully infect enough people so that this diseased mode of thinking becomes chronic, deep-rooted, instinctual.  If the Devil's greatest triumph was that he convinced people he did not exist, the Left's greatest triumph has been to convince people that the Leftist way of thinking is normal.  It is not.  It is a perversion of reason and a horribly mutant form of logic. It is antithetical to human life.  Nothing but decay and destruction are left [pun intended] in it's wake.


What They're Saying About
BOB BELVEDERE &
The Camp Of The Saints...

'Sir Bob of Belvedere'
Smitty

'So many good things at Camp of the Saints that you need to just click and keep scrolling.'
Paco

'Go, read it, fine stuff over there!'
GatorDoug

''Belvederus Maximus'
Smitty

'You are contributing to a noble yet futile cause -- the butchification of metrosexuals.
TCOTS roolz!
'
Red

'[H]e takes retro dame blogging to a new, narrative noir level.'
Smitty

'Staunch Rule 5 aficionado Bob Belvedere, is shameless indeed (I have so much respect for this man)!'
The Classic Liberal

'Who knew he was such a fan of the undead?'
Smitty

'We need fighters, and I suspect Beck will fight 'til ev'ry foe is vanquished.
Bob Belvedere gets it. Phyllis Chesler gets it.
We defend truth and liberty against lies and tyranny. Every eye is upon us and we are surrounded by enemies as numerous as the grains of sand on the shore. Let us determine to die here, and we will conquer.
WOLVERINES!'
Stacy McCain

'Bob Belvedere, you're a nasty piece of work.'
Anonymous

'you charming rogue'
Robert

'The sad decay of Bob Belvedere into a Rule 5 junkie saddens us all.'
Smitty

'Belvedere went slightly crazy on us.'
Smitty

'And thank you, Dr. Belvedere, for setting me straight on Rule 5! I tell ya, that Belvedere Dude is Funny!'
Irish Cicero

'Kevin Binversie is not nearly so shameless a blogwhore as Troglopundit . . .
but then again, nobody really is. OK, maybe
Bob Belvedere, as if anyone could compete with Bob.'
Stacy McCain

'Lord Fatheringay von Whoopsie of the Dung Heap Hooter'
—Anon. —


This site  The Web 








"...Satan shall be loosed out of his prison and shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth...to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea.  And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and encompassed the Camp of the Saints...and the Beloved City: and the fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them...."

Revelation 20:7-9

All original material ©2008/2009 by Robert Belvedere.