|
|
Saturday, July 25, 2009
RULE 5 SATURDAY [Updated - see below]In compliance with Rule 5 and my Maker's Mark barrel, the TCOTS Rule 5 Compliance Committee presents....
JANE RUSSELL...
I wonder what's she doing now...

I hope she's thinkin' 'bout me, 'cause my heart says "Yes, indeed" in me

'Cause it's witchcraft...

That sly come hither stare...

And I've got no defense for it...

The heat is too intense for it...

What good would common sense for it do...

Time to go folks...I'm running late and the Lady Jane doesn't like to be keep a-waitin...
They call you lady luck But there is room for doubt At times you have a very un-lady-like way Of running
out Your on this date with me The pickin's have been lush And yet before the evening is over You might
give me the brush You might forget your manners You might refuse to stay And so the best that I can do is pray...
Luck be lady tonight Luck be lady tonight Luck if you've been a lady to begin with Luck be a lady tonight
Luck let a gentleman see Just how nice a dame you can be I know the way you've treated other guys you've
been with Luck be a lady with me
A lady never leaves her escort It isn't fair, it isn't nice A lady
doesn't wander all over the room And blow on some other guys dice
So lets keep this party polite Never
get out of my sight Stick with me baby, I'm the guy that you came in with Luck be lady tonight
A lady
doesn't leave her escort It isn't fair and its not nice A lady doesn't wander all over the room And blow on
some other guys dice
So lets keep this party polite Never get out of my sight Stick with me baby, I'm
the fella you came in with Luck be a lady Luck be a lady Luck be a lady tonight Eleven!
UPDATE:
Over at The Other McCain, Smitty has been good to your humble Dispatcher once again and linked to two TCOTS postings, this one and our Hump Day mini-Rule 5 here. Thanks friend. He's put together a great set of links, per usual.
Friend Paco has scored
again with the best RULE 5 posting of the week: Rita Hayworth singing and proving that God does exist. Damn the man.
The Classic Liberal was kind enough to link
to my two RULE 5 postings in his Rule 5 Saturday posting. He's been doing a very interesting set of postings called What Is Conservatism? and is almost finished. When he does, I hope to offer some thoughts here. Its well worth the read.
Capt'n William Teach, over at The Pirate's Cove, has up a great Patriotic Pinup by Gerald von Lind [and I'm proud to be an American...]. There also be some good linkage there,
me hearty.
25 jul 09 @ 8:18 pm edt
BOB BELVEDERE!...I DIN'T KNOW HE WAS STILL ALIVE...Please accept my apology for not having posted a single blessed thing in the past
two days.
I've been working on a special project that I am hoping to unveil in the next day or so.
There
will at least be a RULE 5...stay tuned...
25 jul 09 @ 8:11 pm edt
Thursday, July 23, 2009
SOCIALIZING HEALTH CAREI've just added ten new links to the SOCIALIZING HEALTH CARE part of the JUST THE FACTS, MAM section of the WWU-AM page.
Here are
highlights from three of them...
1) From Dr. Helen:
...Obama shows himself not only to have no understanding
of medicine, life, or the science of improving people's lives, but no empathy for
those of us who have life threatening illnesses that require immediate medical intervention.
Some heart arrhythmias
are deadly, and a doctor telling a patient to take a pain killer to treat V-tach or V-fib should be guilty of malpractice....
2) Robert Stacy McCain on 'The National Endowment Fallacy':
...if you listen to Obama or other liberals discuss health care,
you will soon discover that they have smuggled into the argument the hidden premise that no one can receive health care without
health insurance. Therefore, the 40-odd-million "uninsured" represent a crisis, and government is the only
solution to this crisis (or to anything else liberals consider to be a crisis).
Thus, the argument involves a false
dilemma: Either the federal government must take action -- involving expenditure of tax dollars and various coercive regulations
-- or else there will be no health care, at least for the "uninsured" who constitute the canary-in-the-coal-mine
of the liberal argument against private-sector provision of health care.
Just another tool from the
Leftist toolbox—a power tool in this case.
3) From Jimmie Bise:
At this point, we can be certain
of three things about President Obama's health care plan, even after his speech Tuesday. 1. Opposition to it is broad and bipartisan and includes Senator Barack Obama.
2. You should take anything he says about with a planetary-sized grain of salt because, as we learned today, he's really not
sure what's in it.
3. It is going to be ridiculously expensive.
OBAMACARE DELANDA EST!
23 jul 09 @ 8:10 pm edt
UPSIDEDOWN YOU'RE TURNING MEFrom The Washington Post, Glenn Kessler reporting:
The war of words between North Koreaand the United States escalated Thursday, with North Korea's Foreign Ministry lashing out
at Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton in unusually personal terms for "vulgar remarks" that it said demonstrated
"she is by no means intelligent."
...
The Foreign Ministry statement attacking Clinton also
amply demonstrated the North Korean mood. "We cannot but regard Mrs. Clinton as a funny lady as she likes to utter such
rhetoric, unaware of the elementary etiquette in the international community," a Foreign Ministry spokesman said, according
to North Korean media. "Sometimes she looks like a primary schoolgirl and sometimes a pensioner going shopping."
I haven't looked out my window today: are pigs flying? They must be because I find I'm in agreement with the
North Korean Foreign Ministry. Wow...it truly is a world turned upsidedown.
23 jul 09 @ 2:04 pm edt
RESISTANCE IS FUTILELet's see...the American [and I use that term loosely] Leftists want to,
in a sense, import the Canadian Health Care System into the United States and assimilate it—you know, tweak the
parts that don't work up North, then alter a few bits and pieces on the surface so it will be more acceptable to
Americans. The Lefties think they'll be able to do what no other country that has adopted government-run health care
has been able to do: make it work. Recent history shows that it has never worked wherever it has been tried and people
have died as a result. History also teaches that any imported idea of this kind can never be assimilated by the welcoming
country. Rather, the idea assimilates the country it emigrates to. That's why I like to think of Obamacare as
Borgcare.
The next question is: after we have been assimilated into this strain of Borg, what will the next one be? How about Sharia? Its already creeping into America like slimy ooze under an
old door. Perhaps, it will come through Canada? [is there a pattern starting to take shape here?].
Over
at The Corner, Mark Steyn provides us with two updates that answer the question 'Que Pasa Canada?':
Three or so weeks back, a submerged car was found in the Rideau Canal
in Kingston, Ont., containing the bodies of three teenage girls and their aunt — a story initially reported as Mysterious Death Of 4 Quebecers Baffles Kingston Police. When it emerged that the four female Quebecers were, in fact, Muslim, the tearful parents
offered up a strange tale of an impromptu midnight driving lesson gone tragically wrong (Driving Lesson May Have Led To Drowning).
La Presse is now reporting that the girls' father, mother, and brother have been arrested en route to Montreal Airport, and that the deceased "aunt" or (alternatively) "cousin"
was, in fact, the girls' father's first wife. The words "crime d'honneur" are beginning to creep into newspaper accounts.
Meanwhile, the blogger Scaramouche suggests that, while they're looking into honor killings in the Kingston area, the constabulary might
take a gander at another curious aquatic accident this month....
Please take the time to click here and continue reading his posting.
I am Barackus of Borg. Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated.
Your life as it has been is over. From this time forward, you will service us!
23 jul 09 @ 1:56 pm edt
IG-GATE: 'Threats Of Future Claims' EditionI've added four new links to the IG-GATE
part of the UNWELCOME DISTRACTIONS Section of the WWU-AM Page just now.
Here are highlights from two...
1) Over at AmSpecBlog, Robert Stacy McCain wherein he raises some questions. Here's one:
If [Rep. Doris] Matsui [D-CA District which includes Mayor Kevin Johnson's Sacramento] contacted the White House before Walpin was fired . . . Well, this interview is certainly
raising questions on Capitol Hill.
2) Over at The Washington Times, the Editors make a good point [tip of the fedora to Quin Hillyer]:
The Obama administration will have a hard
time defending its actions against a suit by fired AmeriCorps Inspector General Gerald Walpin.
In our June 24 editorial
headlined "Lieberman overlooks Walpingate," we suggested that the White House "verged on improper age discrimination
by claiming the 77-year-old Mr. Walpin was 'disoriented' and 'confused' at a May 20 meeting." In a footnote to a lawsuit
Mr. Walpin filed on Friday demanding his job back, Mr. Walpin's lawyers have written that "the [White House] conduct
at issue raises serious questions of age discrimination, retaliation against whistleblowers and defamation."
The suit itself does not (yet) claim age discrimination -- but the threat of a future such claim, which is inherent in the
footnote, is justified based on the circumstances.
3) I know the IG-Gate section over at
WWU-AM is getting more difficult to read and use because of the large number of links that now reside there.
And I know, as this Scandal Train picks up steam, its going to get worse. I am working diligently at a solution for
this and hope to have it implemented soon. Your patience and indulgence are much appreciated.
Keep checking
back at WWU-AM for the latest on this Scandal Train as it keeps a rollin'.
WWU-AM — WE WARNED YOU, AMERICA
23 jul 09 @ 11:45 am edt
THE GANG THAT COULDN'T GOVERN STRAIGHT, SCENE III[Click here for Scene I and here for Scene II]
The Scene: the Oval Office, Monday afternoon July 21st...
Rahm 'The Enforcer' Emmanuel enters the room...
R TE E: Hey boss, da CBO guy's waitin' outside.
Fearless Leader: At least he's on time. Anyone with him?
R TE E: Naw, he came by himself, just like
we told him to.
FL: Good. I don't want anyone outside of our Family to witness this.
R TE E: If
he hadda brought someone, we wudda distracted dem. I had Larry 'The Wimp' Summers waitin' in da Cabinet Room just
in case, if you understand what I mean?
FL: That's why I love you Rahmbo—you're always thinking.
R TE E: Dat's why I'm still breathin' Boss.
Both men laugh...
FL: Good one conseligere of
mine. Alright, let's get this show on the road. You ready Joseph?
Joe Hill Biden: Sure thing kid...I
mean...Pop.
FL: Remember now: I want you to keep that yap shut and just sit there and look serious.
JHB:
Okey-dokey. You can rely on me.
R TE E: Shoud I brings him in?
FL: Yup, I'm ready.
R
TE E goes out and comes back in with CBO Director Douglas Elmendorf. During these few seconds, FL's appearence and demeanor
change...
FL: Mr. Elmendorf.
Reaches out his hand and, as they shake hands, FL pats
him on the upper arm with his other hand...
DE: Mr. President.
FL: Rahm, please pour Senior
Elmendorf some grappa.
R TE E does and hands it to DE...and they sit. FL sits in a leather office chair
with R TE E and JHB on one couch and DE on the other by himself.
DE: Mr. President. Thank you for inviting
me here, although I must say its highly unusual, what with the CBO Director supposing to be independent and non-partisan.
FL: My TARP credit good enough to buy you out?
DE: Buy me out?
Biden laughs nervously
FL: Changing your health care reform report. Altering the cost figures. The Obamleone Family wants to
buy you out.
DE: The White House wants to buy me out? No, I stay independent, you don't buy me
out.
FL: Your report loses us support for health care reform. Maybe we can do better.
DE: You
think I slanting my reports?
FL: You're uncooperative.
DE: You goddamn Chicago guys, you really
make me laugh. I do you a favor and go easy on Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae when you're having a bad time, and now you're
gonna try and push me out!
FL: You went easy on Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae because the Obamleone Family
arranged for the Frank Family to bankroll your Office, and the Pelosi Family on the Coast guaranteed their
safety. Now we're talking business, let's talk business.
DE: Yeah, let's talk business. First of all, you're all
done. The White House don't even have that kind of muscle anymore. Obamacare's sick, right? The Inspector
General Scandal's gonna explode wide-open soon. You're slowly getting chased out of D.C. by Palin and the
other Families. What do you think is going on here? You think you can come to the CBO and take over? I talked
to Boehner - I can make a deal with him, and still keep my independence!
FL: Is that why you verbally slap
my Vice President around at parties?
JHB: Aw, now that, that was nothin', Bam. Dougie didn't mean
nothin' by that. Yeah, sure he flies off the handle every once in a while, but me and him, we're good friends, right
Dougie?
DE: I got an independent agency to run. I gotta kick asses sometimes to make it stay independent. He
said some stupid things, Joey did, so I had to straighten him out.
FL: You straightened my VP out?
DE: He was banging out stupid statements two at a time! Congressmen couldn't get a word in edgewise!
What's the matter with you?
FL: I leave for another townhall forum on health care tomorrow—think about
a price.
DE: Sonofabitch! Do you know who I am? I'm the Director of the CBO! I made my independent
bones when you were selling cocaine to undergraduates!
JHB: Wait a minute, Dougie...Doug...I got an idea...
DE leaves angrily and slams the door on his way out. The wind from the slam causes Larry Summers's comb-over
to fall to the side of his head.
JHB: Rahm, you're the Consiglieri and you can talk to the Pres, you can explain...
R TE E: Da Boss is in charge of alla da Family business. If you have anything to say, say it to da
Don.
JHB: Bam...you do not come to Washington and talk to a man like Dougie Elmendorf like that!
FL: Joey, you're my Vice President, and I love you old man. But don't ever take sides with anyone against
the Family again. Ever. Now go and lobby that Jew Congressman like we talked about this morning.
JHB:
[downcast] Yes sir.
FL: And stick to the party line this time.
JHB leaves with shoulders drooping.
FL: Rahm, get me Luca Sharpton. I want him to make contact with this 'independent Director'. He can tell
him he's dissatisfied with the treatmenthe's getting at the White House and that he'd like to work with him on racial issues.
I want him to buddy-up to him, get him to confide in him, find out what's under his fingernails. Then I want him to
publicly charge the CBO office with widespread and institutional racism. Have him consult with Henry Gates if necessary.
R TE E: Right away, Boss. Ya sure yaz just don't want this CBO stroost to have an accident?
FL: Let's
see if this way works first; there's been too much blood already.
R TE E: I getz him rightta way, Boss.
FL: Now, if there's nothing else, I'd like to get back to planning my trip to Martha's Vineyard.
End
Scene.
From Jake Tapper at ABC News, we learned: Republicans on Wednesday criticized as inappropriate a meeting President Obama held Monday with the director
of the Congressional Budget Office, Douglas Elmendorf.
Elmendorf, a Democratic appointee, has been a thorn in the
side of President Obama and congressional Democrats for the way he has analyzed health care reform legislation. In their view,
Elmendorf hasn’t sufficiently given their health care reform proposals enough credit for cutting costs – which
has caused them political problems in getting the legislation passed. Last week, frustrated at one analysis by Elmendorf,
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., snapped, "what he should do is maybe run for Congress.”
“No
one blames Mr. Elmendorf for accepting an invitation from the President of the United States,” House Minority Leader
John Boehner, R-Ohio, said in a statement.“The issue is whether it was appropriate for the White House to invite him
to discuss pending legislation before Congress at all.”
Said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky:
"I noticed that the CBO director was sort of called down to the White House yesterday. It strikes me as somewhat
akin as the owner of the team asking the umpires to come up to the owner's box."
McConnell said that "if
the CBO is to have credibility, they're the umpire. They're not players in this game."
CBO is tasked with
providing “objective, nonpartisan, and timely analyses to aid in economic and budgetary decisions on the wide array
of programs covered by the federal budget.”
The White House flatly rejected the idea that there was anything
untoward about the invitation or the meeting, which took place on Monday for just under an hour....
23 jul 09 @ 8:31 am edt
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
u3v7wi4nq9
22 jul 09 @ 8:56 pm edt
IG-GATE: Rolling Up The TARP EditionI've added seven more new links to the IG-GATE
part of the UNWELCOME DISTRACTIONS Section of the WWU-AM Page just now. That's a total of seventeen added just for today.
The Scandal Train is comin' 'round the bend.
One of the links added is to an ABC News podcast in which Jake Tapper and Huma Khan interview Neil Barofsky,
Special Inspector General [SIGTARP] for the Troubled Asset Relief Program [TARP]. A highlight from their report on the podcast:
Barofsky told us that the
Treasury Department “is not being transparent with respect to the TARP,” the $700 billion in funds (and more)
the government is using as loans and bailouts to help stabilize the financial markets. “They’ve failed to adopt
some very basic recommendations we’ve had toward transparency,” he said.
Called the “SIGTARP,”
Barofsky appeared before Congress this week and told them that the government’s commitment to fix the financial system
could potentially reach $23.7 trillion, and criticized the Treasury Department for calling his team’s estimate “inflated.”
“I think that the Treasury Department ought to read the report before they make comments, at least the spokesperson’s
office,” Barofsky said. “Our methodology is laid out in black and white in the report. ... As far as the
numbers being inflated, where do you think we got the numbers from? We got it from the Treasury Department, we got it from
the Federal Reserve. ... If these numbers are inflated, it’s because they inflated them when they put them out
in the public, not because of us.”
The inspector general defended the numbers outlined in his report, saying
that all his team has done is to “gather the 50 programs, put them in one place, and told the American people what
the government has said about the maximum of each of these programs.”
“Perhaps their criticism is that
we dare to do math,” he said....
Ya think?
Keep checking back at WWU-AM for the latest on this Scandal Train as it keeps a rollin'.
WWU-AM — WE WARNED YOU, AMERICA
22 jul 09 @ 7:58 pm edt
IG-GATE: QUICK NOTE TO READERS
22 jul 09 @ 5:17 pm edt
A LITTLE HUMP DAY RULE 5Not only are Robert Stacy McCain, Byron York, Michelle Malkin, Ed O'Keefe on the
hunt of those involved in the IG-Gate Scandals, but so is this gal...
 and she's fit to kill.
22 jul 09 @ 11:04 am edt
TRISTISSIMUS HOMINUM*Over at Paco Enterprises, the ever-perceptive Paco has noticed a change in Tiberius Obamacus's demeanor now that he's having trouble getting his way for the first time
in his life:
...His speeches have become desperately bombastic, his arguments increasingly
unbelievable, and his tactics more worrisomely gangsterish. In the arrogance of his first hundred days, he showed no willingness
to develop genuine bipartisan solutions; now he’s stuck with a party, half of whose members think he’s too radical,
and half who don’t think he’s radical enough.
We are a strong and enduring nation - but just how many
Carters can we stand in one human lifetime?
That's a spot-on observation. Will the word 'flailing'
start to be applied soon to this spoiled brat by some pundits? Probably, but I would warn: don't underestimate
what this man is willing to do to achieve his ends. He is a classic Leftist and that means he subscribes, like Lenin,
to the belief that his goals, because they are part of THE ANSWER, must be achieved 'by any means necessary'. He is
committed to his utopian vision and will not allow anyone to stand athwart him yelling 'Stop!'. I've studied
Leftism and Leftists for most of my life and I can tell you he ranks up there with the most famous of them.
If
a strong opposition continues to plague him, our beloved Tiberius, like the real Tiberius, may descend into paranoia.
My question: who will end up being his Sejanus?
One quibble with my friend Paco: Our beloved Tiberius is much worse than Carter in that he is more strong-willed
and is deeply committed to immanentizing the eschaton.
*Pliny The Elder [the gloomiest of men]
22 jul 09 @ 10:54 am edt
MARY JO KOPECHNE COULD NOT BE REACHED FOR COMMENT IIOver at AmSpecBlog, Quin Hillyer has posted what I think it the
definitive statement about Ted Kennedy. He was prompted by the 40th Anniversary of death of Mary Jo Kopechne this past
weekend due to the criminal negligence of the Senior Senator from Massachusetts. A highlight:
While Miss Kopechne may well still have been alive, this man, this senator, walked past four houses without asking
for help, returned to a guest cottage and did not call for help, went back to his hotel and went to sleep, awoke, showered,
hung out on a hotel balcony with the winners of a regatta, chatting pleasantly, and then took the ferry back to Chappaquiddick,
ignoring aides' advice to report the incident, making numerous phone calls to others but still not reporting the incident....
and he still suffered no legal ramifications worth talking about, still stayed in office, and still had the appalling viciousness
to slander Judge Robert Bork, smear all sorts of other Republicans, accuse President Bush of bribing foreign leaders, bent
every rule of decency in his treatment of his ideological adversaries, set up sham investigations of judicial nominees, and
in essence spent a whole career doing horrible things that only he could get away with, meanwhile seriously eroding our level
of public discourse and of conduct in office (not to mention his awful private conduct for another two decades at least after
Chappaquiddick).
Bravo Quin!
Please take the time to click here and read his full posting.
Also, please click on the link that follows to read my take on Edward Moore Kennedy and his whole %$@#& Family [I'm
having trouble getting the link feature to work properly—its been that kind of week here at TCOTS]:
http://www.thecampofthesaints.com/2009.07.19_arch.html#1248134895473
22 jul 09 @ 10:26 am edt
IG-GATE: 'Hear That Train A Comin' EditionI've added eight ten new links already today to
the IG-GATE part of the UNWELCOME DISTRACTIONS Section of the WWU-AM Page just now.
This sucker's picking up speed.
From Ed O'Keefe's Federal Eye blog this morning over at The Washington Post,
we learn:
Rep. Edolphus Towns
(D-N.Y.) said his Oversight and Government Reform Committee would suspend its investigation into the firing of Gerald Walpin,
the former inspector general at the Corporation for National and Community Service, since the former watchdog filed suit against
the agency last Friday in federal court.
"We have met
with White House staff and interviewed staff at the Corporation for National and Community Service, and Democratic and Republican
board members, and have reviewed hundreds of pages of documents," Towns said in a statement. "This evidence shows
that the Corporation board’s report expressing concerns about Mr. Walpin’s performance was fact-based, unanimous,
and nonpartisan." Towns said President Obama had "legitimate reasons for removing Mr. Walpin."
The panel will however look into the firing of Judith Gwynn, who was removed as ITC's inspector general in June. It also continues to investigate the unexpected retirement of Amtrak's inspector general,
who left the rail company on the same day he submitted a report about potential interference with his investigations.
Senator Charles Grassley is proposing the creation of an Inspector-General-in-Chief in a posting over at
Politico.
In a posting last night over at The Other McCain, intrepid reporter Stacy McCain wrote:
...There's a lot of stuff out there, in other words, and you need to see it all
if you want to try to understand this thing. "Try,"
I say, because I don't even claim to understand it all yet. My sources talk about things and sometimes I can tell they're
trying to drop me a hint of something they want me to write about, e.g., "Who Is Eleanor Acheson?" It's important
to ask the right questions, as one of my sources said.
On the one
hand, there is the temptation to focus on one aspect of the story -- the Washington Times keeps calling this "WalpinGate,"
which is too narrow -- but on the other hand, you've got to be careful not to waste time playing "connect-the-dots"
with things that might not really be connected. Yes, there's a pattern, but that doesn't mean there's a conspiracy.
He was also kind enough to mention my ongoing aggregation over at the UNWELCOME DISTRACTIONS Section of the WWU-AM Page. This copy boy thanks you Mr. Gatlin.
Keep checking back at WWU-AM for the latest on this Scandal Train as it keeps a rollin'.
WWU-AM — WE WARNED YOU, AMERICA
22 jul 09 @ 8:24 am edt
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
UPDATES TO THE WWU-AM PAGE TODAY
21 jul 09 @ 8:15 pm edt
IG-GATE: Fight Back EditionI've added a total of ten new links today to the IG-GATE
part of the UNWELCOME DISTRACTIONS Section of the WWU-AM Page.
Two of them I just posted: one is the latest from Stacy
McCain and the other is from an exclusive that Gerald Walpin gave to The Washington Times. Here's a
highlight:
"For a second I was thinking, 'Why do I need all of this?' I'll
just resign and go back to my good legal practice in New York," inspector general Gerald Walpin told The Washington Times
America's Morning News radio news show on Tuesday.
"But I would then be part of the apparatus that is totally
torpedoing the inspectors general," Mr. Walpin continued. "The watchdog would not really be a watchdog. He'd just
be afraid of his shadow."
Keep checking back at WWU-AM for the latest on this wide-ranging Scandal.
WWU-AM
— WE WARNED YOU, AMERICA
21 jul 09 @ 7:55 pm edt
SHAMELESS BWDoug Ross [Director Blue] has published two very interesting postings lately...
1) Somehow the man has gotten ahold of some of the questions
that have been submitted to Al-Qaeda's #2 Ayman Zawahiri on his website and that he has vowed to eventually answer.
Here's two of them:
Dear Mr. Doctor Zawahiri,
If your group happens
to gain access to a nuclear weapon and detonate it in a western country, would you be so kind as to purchase some carbon offsets
to make up for any thermonuclear warming that might endanger our snowcaps? Please visit PimpMyOffsets.com or call +1-888-555-GORE,
toll-free, for more information. Thanks for your support in helping keep the world a greener place,
A. Gore, Belle
Meade, TN
* * *
Dear Dr. Zawahiri,
How can I help?
Sincerely, Keith O., NYC
Please take the time to click here and read the rest.
2) Mr. Ross is truly an amazing man—he's now outdone himself: somehow, someway he's gotten his hands on a government
newsreel from the near future! He's got stills and the transcript. A highlight from the narration:
And more positive news on the economic front: the rate of unemployment increases has slowed,
moving from 17.1% to 17.4%, a tenth-of-a-percent less than analysts had predicted! Proof positive that Stimulus Seven is working!
What a man is this Ross-fellow. Please click here to see and read the whole amazing thing. [tip of the fedora to Instapundit, who's also an amazing (and generous) man]
21 jul 09 @ 7:16 pm edt
'EVERYTHING WENT JUST AS PLANNED'Over at Paco Enterprises, we're being treated to another installment
in the saga of Detective Paco. A taste:
“Take a look, Bo. What’s
that big object on the bow that looks like a deck house or a port-a-potty?”
Bo squinted through the lenses.
“Naw, that ain’t no deck house. That’s Al Gore. He’s taken to wearin’ a white uniform; got his
crew wearin’ ‘em, too. And he changed the name of his boat from the Bio-Solar One to the Koenigen
Luisa. Puttin’ on a lotta airs, is what he’s doin’.”
“Say!” Wronwright
snapped his fingers. “The Koenigen Luisa. Wasn’t that the name of the warship in that movie…what’s
the name?”
“The African Queen,” I said. “The Koenigen Luisa was the German
ship that patrolled the lake.”
Bo brightened considerably. “Hey, I saw that one! Got sunk by a homemade
torpedo, I recollect. That’s a possibility, ain’t it, Detective Paco?”
I pulled a coffin
nail from the pack in my shirt pocket and lit it. “Listen, Bo. In the first place, if we torpedo the boat, somebody’s
likely to get hurt, maybe even killed. In the second place, where would we get a torpedo, anyway? No, we’ve got to figure
something else out.”
Do yourself a favor Clyde and take a short hop over to Paco's. When ya get there take a gander at the rest of the
story.
21 jul 09 @ 6:56 pm edt
OBAMCARE: WHERE TO GO FOR THE BEST INFO [Updated below]What is collectively being called Obamacare is one of the most complex
pieces of legislation ever proposed on the national level. There are so many nooks and crannies within it that even
a single expert person, let alone us regular folk, would have trouble understanding it all. While there are a number
of experts in this area that we can rely upon [such as Keith Hennessey, Sally Pipes, Warner Todd Huston, and John
Graham, to name but four of the best] to provide us with useful analysis and explanations, this is still not good enough.
Most of us average folk who are working hard to keep our jobs and raise our families don't have the time to bounce from website
to website and sift through the mounds of background and analysis being provided. We need the aggregators—those
willing to look at it all, cull the best and most useful of them, and then provide us with descriptions, commentary, and
links. Thankfully, there are a number of these types on the conservative side who are doing yeoman's work.
Out of them all, Pundette of Pundit & Pundette, in my opinion, is the best. She's been out there
slaving away, searching through much and distilling the best.
Here's an excerpt from a recent posting of her's
entitled: Beyond Rationing: Controlling More Than Health:
Imagining your own or a loved one's fate in the hands of bureaucrats and "experts" is horrifying. Read this WSJ article about NICE, the UK board that decides who is and who is not worthy of particular drugs and treatments.
They've made some very bad medical decisions because their decisions are based on cost and "there is a limited pot of
money." Examples: rationing of medicine to treat macular degeneration, which causes blindness, to one in five, and for only one eye, because "When treatments are very expensive, we have to use them
where they give the most benefit to patients." The board ruled to refuse treatment of early Alzheimer's with Aricept
though the drug is most effective when taken at the onset of dementia. The article gives more examples of the board going
against best medical practice.
Here's some links to more of her recent postings:
-Obama v America on health care reform
-Rush: Obama lying on health care changes
-What's really in the Obamacare bills
-Kyl on Obamacare
Please visit Pundit & Pundette often for the latest on the attempts to socialize and destroy the American Health Care System.
In the first posting
of Pundette's I linked to above, she provides a link to and a quote from an op-ed by Betsy McCaughey in the New York Post:
There's plenty of waste in Medicare, but the Congressional Budget Office estimates
only 1 percent of the savings under the legislation will be from curbing waste, fraud and abuse. That means the rest will
likely come from reducing what patients get.
One troubling provision of the House bill compels seniors to submit
to a counseling session every five years (and more often if they become sick or go into a nursing home) about alternatives
for end-of-life care (House bill, p. 425-430). The sessions cover highly sensitive matters such as whether to receive antibiotics
and "the use of artificially administered nutrition and hydration."
This mandate invites abuse, and seniors
could easily be pushed to refuse care. Do we really want government involved in such deeply personal issues?
Another link Pundette provided recently is to this spot-on editorial by the Editors of Investor's Business Daily:
What wasn't known until now is that the bill itself will kill the market for
private individual coverage by not letting any new policies be written after the public option becomes law.
The
legislation is also likely to finish off health savings accounts, a goal that Democrats have had for years. They want to crush
that alternative because nothing gives individuals more control over their medical care, and the government less, than HSAs.
With HSAs out of the way, a key obstacle to the left's expansion of the welfare state will be removed.
The
public option won't be an option for many, but rather a mandate for buying government care. A free people should be outraged
at this advance of soft tyranny.
My only quibble: I think it should be called 'Stealth Tyranny'.
Literally, our lives, and those of our families and all Americans, are on the line here.
OBAMACARE DELANDA EST!
SIDENOTE: Please also
keep visiting the special section [Socializing Health Care] I've set up in the JUST THE FACTS, MAM part of the WWU-AMpage. There I provide permanent links to background and analysis on this issue.
After, visiting Pundette, make your next stop JUST THE FACTS, MAM.
UPDATE: I've just added seven new permanent links on the Socialization of
our Heath Care System over at JUST THE FACTS, MAM. This one is the most important.
21 jul 09 @ 2:42 pm edt
IG-GATE: Protection EditionI just added four new links to the IG-GATE
part of the UNWELCOME DISTRACTIONS Section of the WWU-AM Page.
One of those is from a posting by Jake Tapper over at ABC
News. A highlight:
Gerald Walpin, the man who President Obama fired
last month as Inspector General of the Corporation for National and Community Service, will issue the following statement
this morning, a few days after filing a lawsuit seeking reinstatement to his job.
"I am bringing this lawsuit
primarily to protect the system of Inspectors General, which cannot remain viable without insulation from political
and other interference," Walpin will say in the statement. "While I also am troubled at the mud-slinging lengths
those who sought my removal have gone to attempt, belatedly, to rationalize their actions, the most important objective of
this lawsuit is to prevent a successful illegal removal of one Inspector General from being used as a precedent for other
similar interferences and the chilling effect that it would have on the willingness of other Inspectors General effectively
to perform their job when faced with proceeding against friends of people in high places."
Please take the time to click here and read the full report.
Keep checking back at WWU-AM for the latest on this wide-ranging Scandal.
WWU-AM
— WE WARNED YOU, AMERICA
21 jul 09 @ 9:53 am edt
BELVEDERE HANDCUFFED TO THE RADIATORMy daytime ISP is still experiencing some proxy problems, but not as bad as yesterday,
so we'll see how it goes..
21 jul 09 @ 9:07 am edt
Monday, July 20, 2009
IG-GATE: Late EditionI just added three new links to the five new links added earlier today to
the IG-GATE part of the UNWELCOME DISTRACTIONS Section of the WWU-AM Page.
Keep checking back at WWU-AM for the latest on this wide-ranging Scandal.
WWU-AM
— WE WARNED YOU, AMERICA
20 jul 09 @ 8:47 pm edt
STEYN OF THE WEEKENDFrom his most recent appearance on the Hugh Hewitt Show, Mark
Larson guest hosting:
LARSON:Obviously, Joe Biden wasn’t
working with a teleprompter today. Is this an indication about some chaos, some fraying of the fabric if you will, behind
the scenes at the Obama White House? Because obviously he’s on the ropes on health care, cap and trade, cap and tax
doesn’t look like a slam dunk now at the next phase, either. So what’s really happening? They’re going to
get Sotomayor, they’ve got the number of votes, but is something else crumbling?
STEYN:
I think his plan was to throw all the spaghetti at the wall in the first few weeks of the administration. And it would simply
prove impossible for people to keep track of it. You know, one week it’s the bailout, one week it’s the stimulus,
one week it’s cap and trade, one week it’s health care. And you just, it would be impossible to keep track of
all this. And the net result after six months is all this stuff would be a done deal, and it would be impossible to object
to it. But people are beginning to figure out that what all this complicated stuff has in common is a huge price tag. And
once you know that, you don’t have to know all the details to object to it. And so I think that common denominator,
the fact that it’s essentially unaffordable without taxing the life out of the United States, I think that message is
getting through, and is beginning to stick to the President personally.
Let us pray.
Please take the time to click here and read the full transcript.
20 jul 09 @ 8:41 pm edt
WHY WE FIGHTA story like this reminds us why we must fight and win the War Against Islam, and deal them such a blow that they will not recover for another 500 years...
From The Jerusalem Post, Sabina Amidi reporting:
In a shocking and unprecedented interview, directly exposing the inhumanity of
Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei's religious regime in Iran, a serving member of the paramilitary Basiji militia has told this
reporter of his role in suppressing opposition street protests in recent weeks.
He has also detailed aspects of
his earlier service in the force, including his enforced participation in the rape of young Iranian girls prior to their execution.
...
Explaining how he had come to join the volunteer Basiji forces, he said his mother had taken him to
them.
When he was 16, "my mother took me to a Basiji station and begged them to take me under their wing because
I had no one and nothing foreseeable in my future. My father was martyred during the war in Iraq and she did not want me to
get hooked on drugs and become a street thug. I had no choice," he said.
He said he had been a highly regarded
member of the force, and had so "impressed my superiors" that, at 18, "I was given the 'honor' to temporarily
marry young girls before they were sentenced to death."
In the Islamic Republic it is illegal to execute a
young woman, regardless of her crime, if she is a virgin, he explained. Therefore a "wedding" ceremony is conducted
the night before the execution: The young girl is forced to have sexual intercourse with a prison guard - essentially raped
by her "husband."
"I regret that, even though the marriages were legal," he said.
Why the regret, if the marriages were "legal?"
"Because," he went on, "I could tell
that the girls were more afraid of their 'wedding' night than of the execution that awaited them in the morning. And they
would always fight back, so we would have to put sleeping pills in their food. By morning the girls would have an empty expression;
it seemed like they were ready or wanted to die.
"I remember hearing them cry and scream after [the rape]
was over," he said. "I will never forget how this one girl clawed at her own face and neck with her finger nails
afterwards. She had deep scratches all over her."
And you want to negotiate on an equal footing
with this barbaric regime Mr. President? A regime that condones the violent wrenching away of the dignity of young virginal
women who will soon be executed.? A regime that can do this?
 A regime that can condone and encourage this?
 Have you no decency Mr. President?...foolish me...stupid question....
[tip of the fedora to Mark Steyn: 'Must be convenient to have a legal code that obliges all your pathologies.']
20 jul 09 @ 8:31 pm edt
MARY JO KOPECHNE COULD NOT BE REACHED FOR COMMENTThis past Saturday was the 40th Anniversary of the death at Chappaquiddick of
Mary Jo Kopechne due to the negligence of one Edward Moore Kennedy. He never paid for the crime because he paid
enough for it to go away, and he took advantage of the pity Americans felt for his family and lied in a televised broadcast.
Those of us who believe in justice can only take heart in the fact that he will have to answer for his sins once he dies.
The Blogprof has provided is with a top-notch commemoration of the event over at his site.
As he comments: 'The Democrat party ought to be proud!'.
Please take the time to click here and view his full posting. [tip of the fedora to Stacy McCain]
My greatest hope is that, once the Senator dies, Americans will wake
up and say 'Enough with this wretched family! Go away and 'serve the public' no more!' As I wrote in a Dispatch here on 16 December 2008 when it seemed Princess Caroline Kennedy-Schlossberg was
going to be appointed Senator:
My main objection
to her appointment is the belief that seems to infect all Kennedys: that they are entitled to public offices.
There's an arrogance about them that, along with a sense of entitlement, makes my republican blood boil. [I wish they
would all, every single one of them, go away; they've done enough damage.]
20 jul 09 @ 8:08 pm edt
WHAT GIVES?Michelle Malkin has been following the case of captured soldier Pfc. Bowe Bergdahl,
who you may have seen in a video released by the Taliban in the past twenty-four hours.
The evidence is mounting
that he may have deserted.
Mrs. Malkin has been working this story like the great investigator she is.
She has looked at the three possible scenarios that have been put forward and lays out the evidence she has unearthed.
Please take the time to click here and read her full posting which has been updated several times over the course of today.
At one point in it, she quotes from a posting by True/Slantreporter P.J. Tobia. A highlight from his blog entry:
I’ve been reporting for over a week(along with the AP and WaPo) that Bowe Bergdahl, the US soldier who’s gone missing in
eastern Afghanistan, walked off the base on his own accord.
Now, somebody close to the people searching for Bergdahl
has repeated this assertion saying that the soldier left “a note behind that said he was going to the mountains to find
himself. He took a journal and 4 or 5 knives with him.” My source tells me that Bergdahl arrived at a village and asked
if anybody spoke English. That’s when he was captured.
My source tells me that there is no doubt Bergdahl
deserted, which in a time of war is punishable by a court martial at the least, or even execution.
I’m not
the only one saying this. Lt. Col. Ralph Peters(Ret.) told Fox News that Bergdahl is “an apparent deserter,” and intimates
that he wouldn’t feel badly if the Taliban killed Bergdahl. At the end of the segment he does say that we should wait
until all the facts come in to pass judgement, but even Michelle Malkin smells something fishy.
Is Pfc. Bergdahl being used as a dupe? Or
has he joined with the Taliban? Or is he suffering from some kind of mental breakdown [trying to 'find himself']?
One thing that seems clear so far: he is no hero. And quite possibly he has disgraced the uniform.
20 jul 09 @ 7:43 pm edt
BELVEDERE UNLOCKED AND FREEDI am now operating off my night ISP and I should be able to post with no
problems. Apologies for this morning and afternoon, and thank you all for your indulgence.
Another IG-Gate
update is coming, plus other stuff.
20 jul 09 @ 7:24 pm edt
AND THAT'S THE WAY IT WASN'TI generally let some time pass before I speak ill of the dead, but in this
case, before the mythologizing gets too out of hand and set in stone, I feel compelled to release the following into the ether...
RE: Walter Cronkite
He was indeed one of the most trusted men in America for two decades.
He was aware of this and he abused that trust in a most shameless and dishonorable way by slanting his coverage of important
events by editing them to fit his Leftist point of view.
He had a presence like a General Galvin—oozing
authority and commanding respect. We allowed him the privilege to be our news-editor-in-chief, and he abused the privilege.
Yes, we deserve some of the blame for allowing him to get away with it for so long, but we Americans were a less skeptical
and cynical people back then [we younger ones, at least, wised-up in the late 1970's and early 1980's because we had
been through some very disheartening times at an impressionable age].
His bringing of his Leftist biases into
his news reading and reporting only served us well when it came to the space program. And this was just a mere happy
confluence.
The lionizing of him in death has already begun. The MSM [and, sadly, with Fox News Channel
as fellow travellers] are building a figurative grand statute of him. We must be prepared to topple it at the first
opportunity. Getting to it will not be easy, but, once we can break through the barriers, it will be easy as it is a
statute made of sand.
May the man rest in peace in the arms of The Lord. May the myth burn away.
Paco has up a some spot-on personal recollections of Mr. Cronkite. A highlight:
He was one of the gravediggers of Vietnam, a key member of that band of journalists and opinion-mongers who turned
the Tet offensive from what it actually was – a crushing defeat for the Communist guerillas, that permanently destroyed
the Viet Cong as an effective fighting force – into a defeat for U.S. and South Vietnamese military forces. Cronkite
helped the Communists snatch victory from the jaws of defeat by contributing to a massive shift in public opinion in the U.S.
that eventually led our government to abandon Southeast Asia to the inevitable bloodbath.
Please take the time to click here and read his full posting.
20 jul 09 @ 2:35 pm edt
UPDATE to BELVEDERE IN CHAINSUPDATE @1343hrs:
My ISP now is hopping around on one leg, so I will try to update WWU-AM and post here what I was going to
post this morning. Wish me luck.
20 jul 09 @ 1:52 pm edt
BELVEDERE IN CHAINSMy ISP is experiencing some major congestion problems this morning. I have
been trying to post since 0830 hours without much luck. The previous posting on IG-Gate mentions five new links I was
intending to add to the UNWELCOME DISTRACTIONS Section of the WWU-AM Page.
I am unable, at this time, to post anything over at WWU-AM,
so here are four of the links for now:
http://spectator.org/archives/2009/07/20/behind-closed-doors
http://www.washingtontimes.com/weblogs/watercooler/2009/jul/17/more-walpin-gate-lawsuit/
http://newledger.com/2009/07/remember-gerald-walpin/
http://rsmccain.blogspot.com/2009/07/ig-gate-behind-closed-doors.html
I am assured full service will be restored by this afternoon. I apologize for the inconvenience.
20 jul 09 @ 10:31 am edt
IG-GATE: 'When We Get Behind Closed Doors' EditionI just added five new links to IG-GATE
part of the UNWELCOME DISTRACTIONS Section of the WWU-AM Page.
The plot thickens...Robert Stacy McCain has filed his latest
report over at The American Spectator. Here is a highlight:
Win or lose,
the Walpin lawsuit definitely adds a new angle to the story, primarily through the legal process known as "discovery,"
whereby the defendants can be required to disclose…well, just about anything, really. If there is some document that
the plaintiff can convince a judge is relevant to the case, the defendants will be ordered to hand it over, and then there
are the sworn depositions. These requirements expose the defendants to legal jeopardy -- for perjury, obstruction of justice
and other such "process crimes" -- if they don't fully and honestly cooperate.
If all this sounds vaguely
familiar, perhaps the reader is recalling a lawsuit, Jones v. Clinton, which led to the momentous deposition in which
the defendant, William Jefferson Clinton, committed perjury about "that woman, Miss Lewinsky."
Of course,
as Americans were lectured for months on end, "everybody lies about sex," but does everybody lie about firing a
government watchdog whose job is to keep an eye out for "waste, fraud and abuse" in federal agencies?
Please take the time to click here and read the full report.
The casting of the movie version of IG-Gate proceeds apace. The word out of Tinsletown is that Christina Hendricks
has been cast as Stacy McCain's main source 'Deep Cleavage'. My sources tell me that casting may be complete for all
of the major roles by the end of the week. When that happens, you'll see it here first.

Keep checking back at WWU-AM for the latest on this wide-ranging Scandal.
WWU-AM
— WE WARNED YOU, AMERICA
20 jul 09 @ 10:15 am edt
Sunday, July 19, 2009
ONWARD TO GREATER GLORY...BREAKING...
On or around 1500 hours ET this afternoon, The Other McCain passed the two million visitor mark.
Congratulations to Stacy McCain and Smitty.
You both do fine work and deserve any praise that comes your way.
Both men have been very kind with
their time, advice, and linkage to your grateful Dispatcher and to many others.
Well done, good and faithful servants
of The Republic, well done.
Onward to three million!
Please take the time to click here and join in the celebrations.
19 jul 09 @ 7:12 pm edt
IG-GATE: 'The Man' EditionI just added four new links to IG-GATE
part of the UNWELCOME DISTRACTIONS Section of the WWU-AM Page.
Robert Stacy McCain was out Friday doing what real reporters
do and he filed another diary entry of his efforts. A highlight:
My first
visit was to an office where Smith at the desk smiled when he saw me walk in the door. He went into the next room to announce
my arrival and, without saying a word, I walked right in behind him. I saw the initial look of horror on the source's face
when Smith said I was back, but then the source saw me behind Smith and smiled: "Oh, hi, Stacy!"
Nothing
beats shoe leather. What I wanted from this source was to confirm the name and office location of the guy who hadn't responded
to my e-mail the day before. (Hint to public servants: When I send you an e-mail saying "call me at [my personal
cell phone number] at your earliest opportunity," you should RSVP ASAP.)
So I got the information and
added a little extra hassle for good measure. This particular source is also a friend. If your friendly sources object
to journalistic harassment, what kind of friends are they?
Please take the time to click here and read the full entry.
Over at The Sundries Shack, Jimmie Bise comments on the lawsuit filed by fired IG Gerald Walpin:
Ed Morrissey doesn't think Walpin has a chance of getting his job back. I disagree
only because it seems that Walpin's firing blatantly violated the law the President pushed so hard to get passed when he was
a Senator. The government could stall for a while but I have a hard time believing that with so many other things on the President's
plate (and a not particularly competent gaggle of underlings), he's going to pay this case a lot of attention until it's too
late....
Please take the time to click here and read the rest of his posting.
Keep checking back at WWU-AM for the latest on this wide-ranging Scandal.
WWU-AM
— WE WARNED YOU, AMERICA
If you missed it, click here to see how even Hollywood finds this story interesting.
19 jul 09 @ 7:04 pm edt
|
|
Dispatches are archived by week; click on the links above.
 |
 |
'This one was worth
the fight. And it's only one fight in the battle, and we have to keep fighting.' —Doug
Hoffman
The Restoration will not be televised; it will be blogged. —Robert Belvedere
|
|
| Click The Picture Above For The Latest Updates/Linkage |
'Bob Belvedere may have the best compilationof IG-Gate information.' —Robert Stacy McCain
'Robert Belvedere at The Camp
of the Saints appears to be maintaining the definitive index of all things PIG-gate...at TCOTS. ...This is an excellent resource.
We thank you, sir.' —Smitty
'More great commentary and juicy
links on l'affaire IG from Camp of the Saints..' —Paco
Captain Ohab: 'From hell's
heart I stab at thee; for hate's sake I spit my last breath at thee. Ye damned Fox News.'
I may be reached at Robert.Belvedere AT gmail DOT com
FELLOW DHS-CERTIFIED RIGHT-WING EXTREMISTS
|
|
|

|
| 04 AUGUST 1790: The Founding of the U.S. Coast Guard |

|
| Please click on the image and visit the site. |
Please click here to read Behind the ‘Not One Red Cent’ Rebellion by ROBERT STACY MCCAIN
Click here and here to find out why I think Robert Stacy McCain is THE CONSERVATIVE
SHAFT
| MY KENYAN BIRTH CERTIFICATE |
|
|
| Please Click on the Image to View Full Size |

|
| Please click on the image above to learn more from Michelle Malkin. |
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
T E R M S
Let us make precise and clear-cut the terms we should be using.
Aristotle wrote that A is A; you may also call it B, but
it always remains A. A thing is what it is and, to say it is something else, is to deny reality. There is a lot of denial
of reality going around these days.
As John Adams wrote: 'Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes,
our inclinations, the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence'.
POINT 1: There is no "War in Iraq"
or "War in Afghanistan". Like the Pacific and Europe in World War II, Iraq and Afghanistan are
just parts of a larger war. Unlike them, they are not separate from each other. Therefore,
they are part of the Middle East Theatre of Operations [METO] as the Pacific was the PTO and Europe the ETO.
POINT 2: Many on the Left and some on the Right want to "end
the War". There are only two ways to end a war: (1) by achieving Victory or (2) by being Defeated.
A pullout, before Victory is achieved, is Defeat. They want Defeat. Pullout may
be the best policy―I am not arguing that here―but, leaving without achieving our objective is Defeat.
POINT 3: We are engaged in a War Against Islam.
The term is more correct than "War against Islamo-Fascism" or "War On Terror".
Islam has been at war with all non-Muslims since the
time of its founder, Muhammad [his name be cursed]. Like the Hundred Years' War, there have been periods
of peace in this long conflict, but the Muslim has never stopped believing that he is at war with all non-Muslims.
He can't: Allah commands that all of the world be conquered in his name and he must submit, in all things, to the
will of Allah [the word Islam means "submission", sometimes rendered as "surrender"]. Any
periods of peace we in the West have enjoyed have only occurred after we have dealt them such a devastating blow that they
have not been able to wage their jihad and then have pursued polices that have kept them subjugated. This
began to fade in the latter half of the 20th Century as we forgot the dangers posed by this militant religion and
as they regrouped under new and committed leaders.
If you
doubt that Islam is at war with all non-Muslims, keep in mind this: Islamic apologists
often point out that Islam is not a monolith and that there are differences of opinion among the different Islamic schools
of thought. That is true, but, while there are differences, there are also common elements. Just as Orthodox, Roman Catholic,
and Protestant Christians differ on many aspects of Christianity, still they accept important common elements. So it is with
Islam. One of the common elements to all Islamic schools of thought is jihad, understood as the obligation of the Ummah to
conquer and subdue the world in the name of Allah and rule it under Sharia law. The four Sunni Madhhabs (schools of fiqh [Islamic
religious jurisprudence]) -- Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hanbali -- all agree that there is a collective obligation on
Muslims to make war on the rest of the world. Furthermore, even the schools of thought outside Sunni orthodoxy, including
Sufism and the Jafari (Shia) school, agree on the necessity of jihad. When it comes to matters of jihad, the different schools
disagree on such questions as whether infidels must first be asked to convert to Islam before hostilities may begin (Osama
bin Laden asked America to convert before Al-Qaeda’s attacks); how plunder should be distributed among victorious jihadists;
whether a long-term Fabian strategy against dar al-harb is preferable to an all-out frontal attack; etc. [Source: Gregory M. Davis, Islam 101, section
4g, found at http://www.jihadwatch.org/islam101/]
They have been at war with us for
centuries and we, therefore, have been at war with them. We are engaged in a War Against Islam whether
we want to say so or not. In an interview with a Pakistani TV network on 23 July 2008, Mustafa Abu Al-Yazid,
Al-Qaeda's No. 3 man and top commander in Afghanistan, has this to say: “Islam does not distinguish between the
American people and the American government, since both are in a state of war with Islam”. [Source: http://www.memri.org/bin/latestnews.cgi?ID=SD200008]
POINT 4: The term "Islamo-Fascism" seems
to have been created by Leftists. Since (1) they wrongly place fascism on the Right, (2) they believe [rightly]
Muslims want to establish a theocratic regime on Earth, and (3) anything political that has any connection with religion is
bad and emanates out of rightwing thinking, the term makes sense to them. Therefore, the term is nothing
but a way to associate Islam with the right-wing. Muslims believe in a totalitarian way of governing; in
submission [that word] to an all-powerful Islamic leader or leaders.
POINT 5: As to the term "War On Terror",
it is just plain silly: how can you wage war on a thing?
POINT 6: What is fascism? It is when a government
allows private property to exist, but controls and manages the use and disposal of property in all its forms. Citizens
retain all of the burdens and responsibilities associated with property ownership, but are not allowed to control and shape
its use.
As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. The word derives from fasces, the Roman symbol of collectivism and power: a tied
bundle of rods with a protruding ax. In its day (the 1920s and 1930s), fascism was seen as the happy medium between boom-and-bust-prone
liberal capitalism, with its alleged class conflict, wasteful competition, and profit-oriented egoism, and revolutionary Marxism, with its violent and socially divisive persecution of the bourgeoisie. Fascism substituted the particularity of nationalism
and racialism—“blood and soil”—for the internationalism of both classical liberalism and Marxism.
Where socialism sought totalitarian control of a society’s economic processes through
direct state operation of the means of production, fascism sought that control indirectly, through domination of nominally
private owners. Where socialism nationalized property explicitly, fascism did so implicitly, by requiring owners to use their
property in the “national interest”—that is, as the autocratic authority conceived it. (Nevertheless, a
few industries were operated by the state.) Where socialism abolished all market relations outright, fascism left the appearance
of market relations while planning all economic activities. Where socialism abolished money and prices, fascism controlled
the monetary system and set all prices and wages politically. In doing all this, fascism denatured the marketplace. Entrepreneurship was abolished. State ministries, rather than consumers, determined what was produced and under what conditions. [Source: Sheldon Richman, The Concise Encylcopedia Of Economics,
Liberty Fund, found at http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Fascism.html]
On the political spectrum, therefore, it is located between modern liberalism
and socialism.
POINT 7: What is socialism? It is when a government
allows no private property to exist, and controls and manages the use and disposal of property in all its forms.
Citizens are not allowed to control their lives and are subject to the whims of bureaucrats and officials. If they
retain freedoms and liberties, they do so at the discretion of them. On the political spectrum, therefore, it
is the next logical stage after fascism; some would argue that it lies between fascism and communism.
POINT 8: What is pragmatism? It is a tool used by Leftists,
or those operating under the influence of Leftist logic, to achieve Utopian ends—heaven on earth through social, political,
cultural, and spiritual engineering. It is merely a tool of ideology, part of the means to an end.
POINT 9:The Big Lie - When confronted with truths that reflect
unpleasantly on them, the Leftists deflect it buy claiming over-an-over ad nauseum that these truths apply to and are products
of the Right. This practice is known as The Big Lie. It has been successfully practiced by the
Left since, at the very least, the French Revolution. Thus, we have the now-widespread belief that the Nazis and the
Black Shirts of Italy were right-wingers when the reality-the truth-is they were both people of the Left. I suspect
the violent objections from the Left to conservatives use of the term 'fascist' arise from the fact that they have spent well
over seventy years trying to convince the world of The Big Lie that it is not and never has been a Leftist
ideology.
How does one practice this distortion truth and why is it effective? In a report issued during
World War II by the OSS, the author provided an explanation for all practitioners by describing how Hitler practiced it:
His primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault
or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame;
concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than
a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it.
By repeating
their lies over and over, the Left creates a false reality that supplements the real world. In this false reality, the
lie is the truth, the truth is the lie. A is not A. [But we know that A must always be A.]
The Left
also practices a variation of The Big Lie that I like to call The Big Deception which involves
a Big Deflection away from the reality of the situation. None of their policies or actions can survive
direct questioning, so the Leftists must turn the tables on the questioners and make it seem as though the inquisitors have
bad or evil intentions. Overtime and after constant and unrelenting hectoring, the Left's way of thinking triumphs.
They successfully infect enough people so that this diseased mode of thinking becomes chronic, deep-rooted, instinctual. If
the Devil's greatest triumph was that he convinced people he did not exist, the Left's greatest triumph has been to convince
people that the Leftist way of thinking is normal. It is not. It is a perversion of reason and a horribly mutant
form of logic. It is antithetical to human life. Nothing but decay and destruction are left [pun intended] in it's wake.
What They're Saying
About BOB BELVEDERE & The Camp Of The Saints...
'Sir Bob of Belvedere' —Smitty—
'So many good things at Camp of the Saints that you need to just click and keep scrolling.' —Paco—
'Go, read it, fine stuff over there!' —GatorDoug—
''Belvederus Maximus' —Smitty—
'You are contributing to a noble yet futile cause -- the butchification of metrosexuals. TCOTS
roolz!' —Red—
'[H]e takes retro dame blogging to a new, narrative noir level.' —Smitty—
'Staunch Rule 5 aficionado Bob Belvedere, is shameless indeed (I have so much respect for this man)!' —The Classic Liberal—
'Who knew he was such a fan of the undead?' —Smitty—
'We need fighters, and I suspect Beck will fight 'til ev'ry foe is vanquished. Bob Belvedere gets it. Phyllis Chesler gets it. We defend truth and
liberty against lies and tyranny. Every eye is upon us and we are surrounded by enemies as numerous as the grains of sand
on the shore. Let us determine to die here, and we will conquer. WOLVERINES!' —Stacy McCain—
'Bob Belvedere, you're a nasty piece of work.' —Anonymous—
'you charming rogue' —Robert—
'The sad decay of Bob Belvedere into a Rule 5 junkie saddens us all.' —Smitty—
'Belvedere went slightly crazy on us.' —Smitty—
'And thank you, Dr. Belvedere, for setting me straight on Rule 5! I tell ya, that Belvedere Dude
is Funny!' —Irish Cicero—
'Kevin Binversie is not nearly so shameless a blogwhore as Troglopundit . . . but then again, nobody really is. OK, maybe Bob Belvedere, as if anyone could compete with Bob.' —Stacy McCain—
'Lord Fatheringay von Whoopsie of the Dung Heap Hooter' —Anon. —
 |