HomeDark TimesWWU-AMIN GENERALQUOTESHEROESSHARED DNABRITAINMUSICFILM/TVOTHER ARTS/BOOKSC2H5OHABOUT

♦ SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT ♦

I will now be blogging over at my new site:
http://thecampofthesaints.wordpress.com/

This site will remain as an Archive Site, for the foreseeable future, of all postings made before 23 December 2009.  Because of this fact, my domain [thecampofthesaints.com] will still direct you here for the time being.  I have issues to work out with the transference of my archives to the new site that will take some time.

Thank you for your indulgence and I apologize for any inconvenience or confusion.
Bob Belvedere

It's Time To ROC 'N' ROLL: Restore Our Constitution & Restore Our Lost Liberties


Dispatches from
The Camp Of The Saints...
by Robert Belvedere [DHS-Certified Rightwing Extremist / White House Certified 'Fishy' / Carter-Certified Raaaaacist!]

Archive Newer | Older

Saturday, September 12, 2009

RULE 5 SATURDAY: HANNAH GILES [Updated Below]
With the conclusion of our Summer Rule 5 Festival last weekend, The TCOTS Rule 5 Compliance Committee was ready to return back to showcasing the classic ladies of the past century.  They were all prepared to award the coveted Saturday spot this weekend to a lovely but under-appreciated lass who, in her day, was more fetching and beautiful than most of us realize.  However, circumstances beyond The Committee'scontrol have caused them to delay the showcasing of this gem of a find and go with a gal who is in the news for the great work she has done to help expose the corruption at the heart of those now in control of America.  Showing admirable and quite creative initiative, she undertook to do the work the gauche MSM would not do; she hit the pavement like a reporter should and got the story, to the truth, while the pablum puking elites of the major media sat in their chic rent-controlled apartments and quaffed down quiche, sipped trendy wines, and agreed that hopey change was working just fine.  She took to heart the advice of that wise sage, Larry The Cable Guy, and got 'er done.  Therefore, it is with great pleasure that The TCOTS Rule 5 Compilance Committee, by unanimous vote, presents....

HANNAH GILES...
Hannah-Giles-RedEye-02a-300.jpg


Hannah-Giles-RedEye-07a-180.jpg


Hannah-Giles-ACORNvideo-01a-560.jpg


Hannah-Giles-RedEye-01a-560.jpg

[Shots taken from last night's Red Eye]

As for my song selection this week: I don't know why, but, when I think of the lovely Miss Giles, this song pops into my head:

When I take my sugar to tea,
All the boys are jealous of me,
'Cause I never take her where the gang goes,
When I take my sugar to tea.

I'm a rowdy dowdy, that's me,
She's a high hat baby, that's she,
So I never take her where the gang goes,
When I take my sugar to tea.

Every Sunday afternoon, we forget about our cares,
Rubbing elbows at the Ritz, with those millionaires.

When I take my sugar to tea,
I'm as ritzy as I can be,
'Cause I never take her where the gang goes,
When I take my sugar to tea.

Every Sunday afternoon, we forget about those cares,
Rubbing elbows at the Ritz, with those zillionaires.

When I take my sugar to tea, I'm as ritzy as I can be,
'Cause I never take her where the gang goes,
When I take, take my sugar to tea.

UPDATE 13SEP09@2015: Over at The Other McCain, Smitty was his usual kind self and linked to both of my RULE 5postings from the past week.  Thank you, Capt'n.  In his blurb about TCOTS, he wrote:

...In the classic bracket, there is Debra Paget. Now, not to insult Debra, but Hannah has done something courageous and historically important for the whole country. She may have enough of a grasp of organized crime, based upon her ACORN work, that she'll fit in nicely in Congress when she's 25.

Miss Giles in the Congress would be a waste of her skills.  How about Attorney General in a Palin/McCotter Administration?

-The Classic Liberal is his usual kind self too and has linked my two Rule 5's.  This week he presents The Duty To Be Freeby William Faulkner, ably assisted by bombshell Scarlett Johansson.  TheCL certainly makes reading a more enjoyable pursuit, although my reading glasses do tend to fog up a bit.  Thanks Michael.

-Over at WyBlog, Chris answers the question implied by the title of his blog with this, perhaps the greatest wine commercial ever madeIn vino veritas, indeed.  Keep on blogging my friend: you're doing the Lord's work.  [Warning: if like me, you work is a very politically correct office, this video is most definitely NSFW.]

-Instapundit recently posted links to Sci-Fi beauties from 1933 to 2008 [my favorite is Jean Rogers] and a celebration of two Vulcan babes.

-Jamie Jeffords, over at Eye Of Polyphemus, seems to have a lot of time on his hands, but he sure spends it well with daily postings featuring lovely women.  The two best from this past week are here and here.  God Bless America and Mr. Jeffords.

-Speaking of God and blessing and America: Dan Riehl provides us with the fetching Martina McBride singing the famed song.

-Paco provides the dance music and Eleanor Powell doing the boogie-woogie.  Bring back the garter as everyday-wear.

-A rather tight Vodkapundit showcases the intriguing Dita Von Teese.

-Over at Villainous Company, Cassandra, proving that beauty and class are ageless, features a Ziegfeld Girl and links to pics of many more [tip of the fedora to Smitty].

-Theo Spark treats us to a very lovely Sunday Bedtime Totty.  Click and sleep well.

-Over at The Pirate's Cove, the Admiral has another great Sunday pin-up here [with garters].
12 sep 09 @ 7:48 pm edt          Comments

BLOW YE RIGHTWINDS, BLOW
You know, this Iowahawk fellow gets his hands on the most amazing stuff.  How does he do it?  Well...he's done it again: our intrepid friend has gotten hold of a missive penned by T. Coddington Van Voorhees VII, Editor at Large of the National Topsider [Editor-In-Chief, Dick Hurtz from Holden].  It is a great look into the mindset of the 'intellectual conservatives'.  A highlight:

If I gather correctly from my correspondence secretary, a few Topsider subscribers have taken umbrage to my previous encomiums to Mr. Obama as the nation's foremost voice of conservatism. Invariably, these missives will emphasize at great length the President's trillion dollar shopping sprees, diplomatic apologies and bank nationalization schemes, between explicit invitations to fornicate myself. It is apparent these slow-witted correspondents are incapable of seeing the plain truth: that these are merely brilliant tactical policy feints designed by Mr. Obama to appeal to the wide swath of sensible American moderates who, I am assured, are quite keen on unlimited credit and state ownership of the means of production. Once the proletariat is on board, I have every confidence that our intrepid young captain will deftly steer conservatism back to safe harbor. In saner times it would have been a quick fortnight's journey; instead he has been buffeted by the endless gales and squalls of self-styled "conservatives" who have opposed him at every turn.

These, as is now obvious, are the real enemies of conservatism. Is it really necessary that I once again recite their roster?  The Limbaughs, the Becks, the Levins, the entire bloviating panoply of talk radio baboons peddling their toxic brew of anti-government sedition and foot unguents to hordes of slackjawed exurban megachurch McMansionites. The Jindals and Perrys, crypto-secessionist boondock Babbits who rudely decline Mr. Obama's gracious offers of federal largesse. I suppose it is some comfort that we no longer must count the execrable la Palin in their ranks, as her resignation and exile afforded right-thinkers of the nation a brief moment of rational exuberance. But it appears that the ever-fertile Napoleon of Nome intends some sort of coup from her Facebook Elba, attempting to rile up the online lumpenproles with hysteric tales of "death panels" and "tax increases." One is tempted to dismiss it all as some sort of elaborate hoax, but their grunted entreaties have somehow found support among the nation's more dimwitted burghers. What began with the unsightly "Tea Party" idiocy of Spring has metastasized into the full blown dementia on display by health care protesters, filling America's high school auditoriums with simian hoots of insolence directed at the very congressional representatives on whose noblesse oblige they depend.

Not even the occassional well-deserved finger-eating seems sufficient to stop this loathsome ill-dressed plague. Is it any wonder that one no longer finds self-admitted conservatives on Montauk, save for the gardening staff and a few swarthy weekend invaders from Queens in rental Porsches? Just as Dad drove Mamie Eisenhower and her cabal of UFO conspiracy lunatics out of the party in 1963, I have made it my personal crusade to purge our ranks of these downscale populist cretins before they inflict further damage to Mr. Obama and the conservative movement. It is for this reason the President wisely summoned me last week to an intimate political confabulation on Health Care strategy at Martha's Vineyard during his holiday there.

Please do take the time to click here and find out what happens at the confab.  I will not spoil it for you.  However, I must quote the conclusion in full for it could have been written by any one of the 'intellectual conservatives' and, therefore, captures near-perfectly their thinking:

...In concluding our discussion I left the President with words of encouragement and recalled my father's wise counsel of perseverance.

"I am an old hand at sailing, Mr. President, and I have learned that the winds do not always blow one's way," I said. "When you find yourself in the doldrums, I want you to know that all of us in the conservative intellectual movement will be there to blow you."
12 sep 09 @ 6:56 pm edt          Comments

THE QUESTION OF THE DAY...
...courtesy of Jim, the Gateway Pundit:

Guess Which Hopey-Changer Interrupted Bush's Speech in 2006?

For the answer [and picture evidence], please do click here.
12 sep 09 @ 6:42 pm edt          Comments

THE NEVERENDING STORY
While we celebrate our efforts in our campaign to wrest control of the American government from the hands of those who seek to destroy it, we cannot afford to let ourselves to get carried away.  This is merely one battle—albeit a major one—in a longer twilight war against Leftism.  In his most recent Impromptuscolumn, Jay Nordlinger gets it exactly right when he says:

...You never really win. You never really close the case for an open economy, and the open society. You have to fight for these things, year after year, decade after decade, century after century. The socialists and collectivists never rest, never let up.

Please do take the time to click here and read the full column: it is always worth the effort.
12 sep 09 @ 6:38 pm edt          Comments

THE DAILY FISK
The great Greg Gutfeld gave 9/11 Truther Charlie Sheen a damn good Fisking last night on Red Eye[if you're not DVRing the show, well...let's just say: I pity the fool].  The show itself was a great one: the guests were Ann Coulter, S.E. Cupp, and Allen Covert.  He also interviewed Hannah Giles, the gal who went undercover at the ACORN offices.  She's got a grand future ahead of her if this interview is anything to judge by.  Miss Giles is very witty and articulate [and very, very easy on the eyes].  More on her in a later posting.

As for Mr. Gutfeld and the Fisking of 'Nutbag' Sheen, read and enjoy [here's the video]:

So Charlie Sheen recently penned a fictitious conversation between himself and President Obama - one in which he questions our Commander-in-chief on the big 9/11 cover up. Yes, the star of Scary Movie 3 - and Scary Movie 4 - believes that the Bush/Cheney regime were behind the attack, and feels that our current President should investigate immediately, in an effort to answer a "bottomless warren of unanswered questions surrounding that day..."

Now, never mind how insulting this is to anyone personally affected by the tragedy - or who saw it firsthand. Sheen is just awesome for illustrating the three key components to being a conspiracy theorist/loser:

-the egomania. In this "open letter," Sheen actually uses Obama's made up words to compliment himself. Yes, the President admits to enjoying "Two and a Half Men," writes Charlie. And here I thought Martin was the delusional one in the family.

-the mental masturbation. When it comes to truther obsession, the questioning will always be - as Sheen confesses - "bottomless." See, that`s the joy of conspiracy - it`s like an endless bag of Doritos, except instead of chips you get comebacks like "that`s what they want you to think," and "open your eyes dude." It`s so funny how people like Sheen can dismiss all beliefs but their own. Maybe it's not that funny.

-the inherent contradiction found in accusations of a cover-up. Sheen claims that "9/11 has been the pretext for the systematic dismantling of our constitution and Bill of Rights". He says this without realizing that since 9/11, not a single person has stopped him from babbling this nonsense. By spewing relentlessly about crap, he`s done more than anyone to prove there is no cover-up! Christ, I wish the government would silence him, or at least get him a haircut better suited for a middle-aged man.

But look, I love Sheen simply being Sheen. He is a man unencumbered by self-awareness.

Think about it: The world's most famous clueless druggie, gambling-addicted whore-banger thinks he's uncovered a conspiracy - and we should all believe him.

How cute is that?

[And if you don't agree with him, then you're a raaaaacist.]
12 sep 09 @ 6:30 pm edt          Comments

9/12
I watched the coverage of the Rallies around the country on Fox and coverage of the D.C. Rally on C-SPAN [they'll be re-airing it Monday Night on C-SPAN2] and I must say I was very heartened once again by the size, the behaviour, and the attitude of the crowds.  It seems CNN is estimated that over a million people attended the one in the nation's capital.  Vodkapundit has done some excellent blogging on the D.C. event and provided a forum for Stacy McCain as well.

Please do take the time to check out his coverage by clicking here.

-Stacy did a short posting that contains links to others who have been liveblogging here.

-Per usual, Instapundit has some great coverage here.

-Over at The Sundries Shack, Jimmie Bise has a good roundup and analysis.  I also like this challenge he made:

Meanwhile, if there’s anyone working in the media today who would have extensive experience with teabagging, it’s Alan Colmes. Also, he’s a dirty stinking liar and I challenge him to a debate on his contention that the tea party protests oppose health care reform. You and me, 15 minutes a piece, any neutral ground. Let’s see if you have any spine, you dried up piece of offal.

'Debate' Jimmie?  I say this calls for a good old fashioned duel, Sir.  If you agree, I will gladly be your second and deliver the glove slap for you in person to the smirking face of Mr. A. Hole-mes.  Honor must be defended.

-Michelle Malkin has pics and videos here.  A highlight:

12:34pm Eastern: Police estimate 1.2 million in attendance. ABC News reporting crowd at 2 million.

Teeny, tiny fringe, huh?


I can tell you MSNBC has been showing crime documentaries and CNN thinks our Fearless Leader's speech and the Space Shuttle are more important.

Three cheers to Fox and C-SPAN.

-Over at No Sheeples Here, Carol picks up on Glenn Beck's call today to 'refound this nation' here.  She's also created one of her Photoshop specials for the occasion:
We-Must-Refound-This-Nation-560.jpg

-All has not been rosy, however.  Over at Hot Air, Ed Morrissey reports on yesterday's bomb threat against FreedomWorks.

-And finally...Vodkapundit has published a pic of my favorite sign:
George-Washington-WTF-20090912-picVodkapundit-560.jpg
12 sep 09 @ 6:08 pm edt          Comments

ADVISORY
My ISP seems to be having some problems [they've experienced a few DOS attacks in the past], so I may have to publish over at my alternative, beta site.  If you fail to see any future postings, please go to:

http://tcots-nd.blogspot.com/

Apologies for any inconvienience.....Bob
12 sep 09 @ 5:27 pm edt          Comments

Friday, September 11, 2009

'STAND AND NEVER YIELD'
The departed soul I think of most on this day is a hero named Rick Rescorla.  Blackfive has up a great tribute to the man that you'll come away from and be inspired.  He has often been called [and a History Channel documentary is named]: The Man Who Predicted 9/11, but he was much more than that.  Not only did he sacrifice his life heroically on that awful day, saving 2,700 people, but he was also a war hero and a gallant man and husband.  The posting contains many great links.  Here, from one of them, is a highlight that shows what kind of man he was:

In St. Augustine, Dan Hill was laying tile in his upstairs bathroom when his wife called, "Dan, get down here! An airplane just flew into the World Trade Center. It's a terrible accident." Hill hurried downstairs, and then the phone rang. It was Rescorla, calling from his cell phone.

"Are you watching TV?" he asked. "What do you think?"

"Hard to tell. It could have been an accident, but I can't see a commercial airliner getting that far off."

"I'm evacuating right now," Rescorla said.

Hill could hear Rescorla issuing orders through the bullhorn. He was calm and collected, never raising his voice. Then Hill heard him break into song:

Men of Cornwall stop your dreaming;
Can't you see their spearpoints gleaming?
See their warriors' pennants streaming
To this battlefield.
Men of Cornwall stand ye steady;
It cannot be ever said ye
for the battle were not ready;
Stand and never yield!


Rescorla came back on the phone. "Pack a bag and get up here," he said. "You can be my consultant again." He added that the Port Authority was telling him not to evacuate and to order people to stay at their desks.

"What'd you say?" Hill asked.

"I said, 'Piss off, you son of a bitch,' " Rescorla replied. "Everything above where that plane hit is going to collapse, and it's going to take the whole building with it. I'm getting my people the fuck out of here."

Then he said, "I got to go. Get your shit in one basket and get ready to come up."

Hill turned back to the TV and, within minutes, saw the second plane execute a sharp left turn and plunge into the south tower. Susan saw it, too, and frantically phoned her husband's office. No one answered.

About fifteen minutes later, the phone rang. It was Rick. She burst into tears and couldn't talk.

"Stop crying," he told her. "I have to get these people out safely. If something should happen to me, I want you to know I've never been happier. You made my life."

Susan cried even harder, gasping for breath. She felt a stab of fear, because the words sounded like those of someone who wasn't coming back. "No!" she cried, but then he said he had to go. Cell-phone use was being curtailed so as not to interfere with emergency communications.

From the World Trade Center, Rescorla again called Hill. He said he was taking some of his security men and making a final sweep, to make sure no one was left behind, injured, or lost. Then he would evacuate himself. "Call Susan and calm her down," he said. "She's panicking."

Hill reached Susan, who had just got off the phone with Sullivan. "Take it easy," he said, as she continued to sob. "He's been through tight spots before, a million times." Suddenly Susan screamed. Hill turned to look at his own television and saw the south tower collapse. He thought of the words Rescorla had so often used to comfort dying soldiers. "Susan, he'll be O.K.," he said gently. "Take deep breaths. Take it easy. If anyone will survive, Rick will survive."

When Hill hung up, he turned to his wife. Her face was ashen. "Shit," he said. "Rescorla is dead."

The rest of Rick Rescorla's morning is shrouded in some mystery. The tower went dark. Fire raged. Windows shattered. Rescorla headed upstairs before moving down; he helped evacuate several people above the 50th Floor. Stephan Newhouse, chairman of Morgan Stanley International, said at a memorial service in Hayle that Rescorla was spotted as high as the 72nd floor, then worked his way down, clearing floors as he went. He was telling people to stay calm, pace themselves, get off their cell phones, keep moving. At one point, he was so exhausted he had to sit for a few minutes, although he continued barking orders through his bullhorn. Morgan Stanley officials said he called headquarters shortly before the tower collapsed to say he was going back up to search for stragglers.

John Olson, a Morgan Stanley regional director, saw Rescorla reassuring colleagues in the 10th-floor stairwell. "Rick, you've got to get out, too," Olson told him. "As soon as I make sure everyone else is out," Rescorla replied.

Morgan Stanley officials say Rescorla also told employees that "today is a day to be proud to be American" and that "tomorrow, the whole world will be talking about you." They say he also sang "God Bless America" and Cornish folk tunes in the stairwells. Those reports could not be confirmed, although they don't sound out of character. He liked to sing in a crisis. But the documented truth is impressive enough. Morgan Stanley managing director Bob Sloss was the only employee who didn't evacuate the 66th floor after the first plane hit, pausing to call his family and several underlings, even taking a call from a Bloomberg News reporter. Then the second plane hit, and his office walls cracked, and he felt the tower wagging like a dog's tail. He clambered down to the 10th floor, and there was Rescorla, sweating through his suit in the heat, telling people they were almost out, making no move to leave himself.

Rick did not make it out. Neither did two of his security officers who were at his side. But only three other Morgan Stanley employees died when their building was obliterated.


Please do take the time to click here and read Blackfive's posting and follow the links.

R.I.P.
Rick-Rescorla-on911.jpg
Rick Rescorla in the stairway barking orders on 09/11.

11 sep 09 @ 7:59 pm edt          Comments

OFTEN MISTAKEN
On this day, I like to honor, not only those murdered and those who aided the injured and dead, but, also, the members of our armed forces who have been fighting the War Against Islam and doing so with determination and gallantry.  Three cheers to you all.  This American is damn proud of you and is thankful you're there.

IMAO is selling a t-shirt that I think captures the spirit of these great soldiers:
IMAO-TopTenUSMilitarySlogans-300.jpg

Please click here to purchase it.
11 sep 09 @ 7:38 pm edt          Comments

ANOTHER 09/11
Ace Of Spades reminds us that today is also another important anniversary: two thousand years ago, one of the most important battles in history took place, one that has had major repercussions for the world ever since.  I believe Augustus was one of the great leaders in history, but I'm glad that on this day General Varus failed.  From the opening paragraph:

On this date 2000 years ago there was another attack that changed history. It was the Battle of Teutoburg Forest on Sep. 11th. 9 AD in what is now Northwestern Germany where an alliance of Germanic tribes defeated and utterly destroyed a force of three Roman legions. A defeat that shook the entire Roman empire and forever limited the expansion of the empire to the north. A defeat whose effects are still with us today.

Please do take the time to click here and read the rest of the story.
11 sep 09 @ 7:26 pm edt          Comments

READING THE PRESIDENTIAL PROCLAMATION
Text Source: The White House website.

Key: Proclamation text in sans serif type; my comments in serif type.

Through the twisted steel of the twin towers of the World Trade Center, the scarred walls of the Pentagon, and the smoky wreckage in a field in southwest Pennsylvania, the patriotism and resiliency of the American people shone brightly on September 11, 2001. We stood as one people, united in our common humanity and shared sorrow. We grieved for those who perished and remembered what brought us together as Americans.

Today, we honor the lives we lost 8 years ago. On a bright September day, innocent men, women, and children boarded planes and set off for work as they had so many times before. Unthinkable acts of terrorism brought tragedy, destruction, pain, and loss for people across our Nation and the world.

So far so good.  Quibble [and this is, sadly, a widespread phenomenon]: the use of the word 'tragedy' is wrong.  A tragedy is brought by the individual on himself [example from a few years hence: What caused President Obama to fail was vaulting ambition.].

As we pay tribute to loved ones, friends, fellow citizens, and all who died, we reaffirm our commitment to the ideas and ideals that united Americans in the aftermath of the attacks. We must apprehend all those who perpetrated these heinous crimes, seek justice for those who were killed, and defend against all threats to our national security. We must also recommit ourselves to our founding principles. September 11 reminds us that our fate as individuals is tied to that of our Nation. Our democracy is strengthened when we uphold the freedoms upon which our Nation was built: equality, justice, liberty, and democracy. These values exemplify the patriotism and sacrifice we commemorate today.

'We must apprehend all those who perpetrated these heinous crimes': sounds like a police officer or DA.  The attacks were not 'crimes', but an ACT OF WAR.  On 9/11, Islam declared war against the United States.  Our President still lives and acts in the world as if it were 10 September 2001.

'Our democracy is strengthened when we uphold the freedoms upon which our Nation was built: equality, justice, liberty, and democracy.'  The Constitution makes no mention of 'equality' in and of itself.  The Founders were not levellers.  Nowhere did they express a belief that everyone was equal in all things with everyone else.  'Equality' is a concept the French incorporated into the foundations of their Revolution—and we know where that led.  The Founders believed in equality before the law, not equality of result.  As for the word 'justice', I suspect our Fearless Leader would have loved to add the word 'social' before it.  And we know how much havoc that idea has brought about [see Stacy McCain's essay here].  Then there's the word 'democracy': this country was set up as a constitutional republic; the Founders feared democracy.  As Charles and Mary Beard wrote:

As was said long afterward, the founders of the Republic in general, whether Federalist or Republican, feared democracy more than they feared original sin.  [
America in Mid-Passage, Vol. 3]

In that same spirit of patriotism, I call upon all Americans to join in service and honor the lives we lost, the heroes who responded in our hour of need, and the brave men and women in uniform who continue to protect our country at home and abroad. In April, I was proud to sign the bipartisan Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act, which recognizes September 11 as a National Day of Service and Remembrance. Originated by the family members of those who lost loved ones on 9/11, the National Day of Service and Remembrance is an opportunity to salute the heroes of 9/11, recapture the spirit of unity and compassion that inspired our Nation following the attacks, and rededicate ourselves to sustained service to our communities.

Throughout the summer, people of all ages and backgrounds came together to lend a helping hand in their communities through United We Serve. As this summer of service draws to an end, we renew the call to engage in meaningful service activities and stay engaged with those projects throughout the year. Working together, we can usher in a new era in which volunteering and service is a way of life for all Americans. Deriving strength from tragedy, we can write the next great chapter in our Nation's history and ensure that future generations continue to enjoy the promise of America.


The 'Edward M. Kennedy Serve America Act'...hmmm...in honor of Teddy you can serve me a Manhattan, straight-up.

From 'United We Stand' to 'United We Serve'—echos of the 'from each according to his abilities to each according to his needs' bromide of FDR.

'Working together, we can usher in a new era in which volunteering and service is a way of life for all Americans.'  Volunteering for what causes and serving whom?  I think I know how Comrade Obamnin would answer that one.  Leave me alone.  What I volunteer for is my business and what causes I, of my own free will, decide to participate in, are my own Goddamn business.

'the promise of America'...hmmm...wonder what he means by that...oh, yea....fool me: America is only a promise still because, until The Messiah gets his way, there's nothing to be proud of...right, Michelle?  America has never delivered on anything worthwhile.  Nothing to be proud of here; move along now [or should I say: 'be progressive'?]

By a joint resolution approved December 18, 2001 (Public Law 107-89), the Congress has designated September 11 of each year as Patriot Day, and by Public Law 111-13, approved April 21, 2009, has requested the observance of September 11 as an annually recognized National Day of Service and Remembrance.

NOW, THEREFORE, I, BARACK OBAMA, President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim September 11, 2009, as Patriot Day and National Day of Service and Remembrance. I call upon all departments, agencies, and instrumentalities of the United States to display the flag of the United States at half-staff on Patriot Day and National Day of Service and Remembrance in honor of the individuals who lost their lives as a result of the terrorist attacks against the United States that occurred on September 11, 2001. I invite the Governors of the United States and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and interested organizations and individuals to join in this observance. I call upon the people of the United States to participate in community service in honor of those our Nation lost, to observe this day with other ceremonies and activities, including remembrance services, and to observe a moment of silence beginning at 8:46 a.m. eastern daylight time to honor the innocent victims who perished as a result of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this tenth day of September, in the year of our Lord two thousand nine, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and thirty-fourth.

Shouldn't it read 'in the year of your Lord [me], two thousand....'?

And how did our Fearless Leader follow his own proclamation?  Michelle Malkin showed us on her website [worth showing in full]:
Obama-20090911-560.jpg

I'm so inspired
That I just can't hide it...
11 sep 09 @ 10:57 am edt          Comments

PROJECT 2996
All this week, I've been highlighting the work Carol, over at No Sheeples Here, has been doing to honor individual victims of the Muslim terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001 [Please click here to see them all].  She has been performing this wonderful service as a participant in PROJECT 2,996.  I have not be able to find out just who is behind this noble effort, but I want to personally thank them for it.

Project-2996-logo-300.jpg

Please do take the time to click here to see a full list of the participants and those of dead who are being honored.

Here's some of the participants:

-Over at The Other McCain, Smitty knew one of people who perished on that day and he has posted his remembrance here.

-Obi's Sister.

-Over at The Sundries Shack, Jimmie Bise.

-Michelle Malkin.

-Blackfive.

-Cassy Fiano.

-Melissa Clouthier.

-Over at Hot Air, Ed Morrissey.

-Tom Lewis on pilot Charles Burlingame.

If you have done any and would like them listed here, please e-mail me.  I would be happy to provide the space.
11 sep 09 @ 10:23 am edt          Comments

Thursday, September 10, 2009

WAITING FOR O-DOUGH
Over at The Other McCain, Smitty has posted Act II [the final part] of WAITING FOR O-DOUGH, his adaptation of the classic Beckett play for these dark times.

I've set up a special section at the top of the right-hand column of this page with links to each part.  Please take the time to read it all and enjoy the wit and insight [disclaimer: one of the characters is named after me].
10 sep 09 @ 6:22 pm edt          Comments

DEFERENCE HAS ITS LIMITS
I've been doing a little bit more thinking about the Rep. JoeWilson incident during Comrade Obamnin's address to the Politburo the Congress last night.

For the first fifty or so years of its history, such behaviour was not unheard of on the floor of the House and the Senate.  The British Parliamentary tradition exerted quite an influence.  It rarely was directed against sitting Presidents because they hardly ever addressed either of them in person [One of the main reasons for this was the lesson learned by George Washington and his successors after Washington went before the Senate on, I believe, one of the Indian treaties, and was heckled by a few Senators.].  The protocol on this kind of behaviour now in place evolved over time and grew stronger as the Presidency did.  For many decades, the Congress has shirked their duty and excessively deferred to the Executive on too many matters [and conversely has exercised too much authority in foreign affairs which The Constitution pretty much leaves the conduct of in the hands of the Executive].  Constitutional republics should be a messy business and not courtly.  Deference has it limits, and Rep. Wilson had not reached one.

Many are touting him as a hero for what he did.  I would too if he had not apologized.  A typical Republican, he withered as he contemplated the calumnies that would descend upon his head from the Leftists in the Congress and the MSM.  One has to wonder if are there any Republicans who have a pair?  It seems the only one who does is a woman: Sarah Palin.

I don't know if Clifton, over at Another Black Conservative, agrees with what I just wrote, but I know that I agree with what he wrote:

Speaking of booing, Rep Joe Wilson (R-SC) screamed out " You lie" when Obama said that his "plan" would not include illegal aliens. Bravo! If you completely disagree or think that the president is stretching the truth, why not show your disapproval? If Democrats can boo Bush at a SOTUS address, then calling Obama a liar is just fine by me. Pity, Wilson chickened out and apologized already.
10 sep 09 @ 5:01 pm edt          Comments

PROJECT 2996
All this week over at No Sheeples Here, Carol is honoring some of those who were murdered on 11 September 2001.

Please do take the time to click here and check out what she's done so far and for a link to the main project site. 

Thank you, Carol.

Also: Smitty knew one of people who perished on that day and he has posted his remembrance here.

Also: Obi's Sister has done one here.

If you have done any and would like them listed, please e-mail me.  I would be happy to provide the space.
10 sep 09 @ 2:49 pm edt          Comments

IN THE DARKEST DEPTHS OF MORDOR
If you're conservative and an admirer of The Lord Of The Rings, I think you'll like this picture [tip of the fedora to Harvey over at IMAO]:

The Tower of Barad-dûr...
eye-of-sauron-obama-300.jpg

If you're not familiar with TLOTR, please click here.
10 sep 09 @ 2:47 pm edt          Comments

LEFTIST WELFARE
Please do check out the JammieWearingFool's aggregation of the latest news on the MSM's non-coverage of the Van 'The Red' Jones controversy here.

One thing in his aggregation that stood out for me was this item from the New York Daily News that he quotes:

For fallen White House aides, the rallying cry apparently is John Podesta to the rescue! The Obama administration's former green jobs czar Van Jones is headed back to Podesta's Center for American Progress after stepping down from his White House post four days ago amid controversy over his leftist affiliations, the Daily News has learned.

...

He returns to his job as senior fellow at the center-left think tank founded by Podesta, who served as chairman of Obama’s presidential transition team.


Nice to know that he's landed on his feet since its so obvious that he's been dropped on his head many times since his childhood.

To all of you weepy pantywaists out there who felt sorry for 'Serious' Jones, now you can sleep easy tonight: he's landed in the bosom of the Leftist Lords.  To all of you who wanted Van The Man to go away and stay away: well, what did you expect?  The Left always take care of their heroes and martyrs.  As I wrote on Tuesday:

'Serious' Jones may be gone, but don't be surprised if he still retains a time-share on Obama's ear.  The fact that Daschle still does, should be enough warning that this Bolshevik ain't really gone.
10 sep 09 @ 2:36 pm edt          Comments

HOOEY LEWIS & THE JEWS
Over at the Greenroom, Stacy McCain has posted a tour de forcethat concerns itself primarily with the fallacy of the idea of 'social justice', and also with why the majority of Jews identify themselves with the Left.  He includes a wonderful quote from Friedrich Hayek's essay The Mirage Of Social Justice.  Stacy:

In The Mirage of Social Justice, Hayek dismantled this commonplace concept, demonstrating how the pursuit of “social justice” leads to harmful outcomes contrary to the benevolent intentions of those who subscribe to such doctrines. The entire concept of “social justice” is misbegotten, Hayek said:

There can be no test by which we can discover what is “socially unjust” because there is no subject by which such an injustice can be committed . . .  ["Social justice"] does not belong to the category of error, but to that of nonsense . . .

What Hayek is saying is that “social justice” requires treating people as groups, rather than as individuals –  an error similar to the Jim Crow laws that the civil rights crusade sought to overturn. Indeed, with no intention to invoke Godwin’s Law, we might say that ”social justice” shares with Hitler’s categorical antagonism to the Jews this conception of people in terms of groups and not individuals.

The pursuit of “social justice” — accompanied by a rhetoric of “rights” misappropriated to describe what would be more accurately termed entitlements— inexorably leads down that same path that Hayek described as The Road to Serfdom. Only an extremely powerful government can apportion outcomes in the egalitarian manner intended by the phrase “social justice,” superintending the welfare of specially protected groups. As government power expands, individual liberty is eroded.

It doesn’t really matter how we categorize people for the purpose of allotting “social justice.” The Bolsheviks made revolution on behalf of the proletariat and the peasants, and slaughtered many millions of workers and peasants on behalf of their “humanitarian” goals. In America, “social justice” has been invoked not merely on behalf of blacks, but also women, homosexuals, psychiatric patients, prison inmates, drug addicts, HIV sufferers and alleged victims of “predatory lending,” among other categories of liberal victimhood. Every four years, the Democratic National Convention stage becomes a platform for a parade of aggrieved victims, blaming their own group victimhood on malevolent forces (e.g., “Corporate America”) against which the Democratic Party promises to fight in the name of “rights” and “social justice.”

This group conception of “rights” is fundamentally totalitarian, its premises aligned in a syllogism whose conclusion is less individual liberty and more government control. Ron Rosenbaum’s idealistic nostalgia for Dylan and Baez — who doesn’t fondly remember his own youth? — cannot justify the unthinking pursuit of “social justice,” an ideological abstraction that has wrought so much mischief and misery in American political life.


Copy those paragraphs, save them, and use them in anytime Lefty bleats any bromidic pablum about 'social justice'.

Please do take the time to click here and read the full essay.

10 sep 09 @ 2:18 pm edt          Comments

SPEAK NOT THE SPEECH, I PRAY YOU...
Ever your reliable and faithful Captain, I've been sailing through the ether this morning, gathering up the best commentary and analysis of the President's 1,998th speech before the Congress last night.  The seas have been rough, but our beloved Physician-In-Chief has no one to blame but himself for unleashing a whirlwind back in January that has now been upgraded to a Cat. 4 hurricane, Hurricane Barry.  So, without further adieu, let us plunge into the rolling waves of a tumultuous ether....

1) Over at Red State,
Erick Erickson is subdued:

This was not a speech worthy of a national night of media coverage before a joint session of congress.

This was a partisan speech full of rubbing Republicans’ noses in his legislative policy preferences.

Americans tonight are suffering pre-traumatic hemorrhoid disorder, knowing Barack Obama’s government is about to rape their wallets, destroy their wages, and force government healthcare down our throats.

We were treated to a vainglorious, pompous ass playing politics with healthcare while accuses everyone else of playing politics.
And he spent the whole hour lying through his teeth.

...

Whatever the President did not accomplish tonight, he waved around the cadaver named Ted Kennedy as a distraction. It is a good thing Ted Kennedy drank as much as he did, because his corpse held up well as Obama dragged it through the aisles of the House of Representatives like Achilles dragging Hector across the plains of Troy. It was a disgusting display of distraction by a man who has staked his Presidency on the destruction of the American healthcare system.

After his Presidency is over [assuming he doesn't do a Julius Caesar and get himself voted Dictator For Life], our Fearless Leader could start a consulting company: Disgusting Displays R Us.

2) Over at WyBlog,
Chris asks a very pertinent question and makes some damn good observations.  A highlight:

Does anybody believe a Chicago politician can eliminate "waste, fraud, and abuse" from any government program?

...

Even a wink and a nod to tort reform left the Democrats sitting on their hands. The trial lawyers own them and they know it. Nothing can upset the ambulance chasers who write the golden campaign checks.

No mention of any sensible reforms like association health plans or allowing people to buy insurance across state lines. Just new taxes for opting out of Obamacare. Typical of a top-down, autocratic approach to the problem.

Now, Chris, did you have to lump Comrade Obamnin in with the autocrats?  I'll take an autocrat any day over a totalitarian; at least autocrats usually believe they are subject to the rule of God [Bring back Papa Doc!  Or, at least, his fashion sense.].

3) What is going on with The Corner?  I went there and found nothing worth mentioning.  Of course, it could be the fact that McCarthy, Steyn, and Goldberg really haven't weighed-in yet.

4) Over at Eye Of Polyphemus,
Jamie Jeffords was most definitely not impressed by our Fearless Leader:

I doubt Obama did his case any good tonight. His speech was sparse with details. The facts we did get sound like progressive fantasy of an economic illiterate. Of course, that is exactly what Obama is, so [what] should I have expected?

Nothing much, my friend, and nothing more.

5) You know, Steve Green has the right approach to watching a speech by The Anointed One: he drinks, often heavily. 
Some highlights from his drunkblogging of the speech over at Pajamas Media:

4:45PM
The first question is: Which cocktail? The answer is always: Vodka martini. The next question is: Which network? CNN means risking an Anderson Cooper sighting. Fox? Bill O’Reilly risk. On the other hand, you usually get Brit Hume on Fox. So Fox it is.

4:56PM
My sources tell me Fox’s Major Garrett is being groomed for Lt Col.

4:58PM
A 40-45 minute speech for an issue we’ve been talking about since effing April? Who does this Obama guy think he is? Oh, wait…

5:15PM
I can’t look at Michelle without hearing,
“Caroline laughs and
It’s raining all day
She loves to be one of the girls…”


5:16PM
You know why he’s getting such a good reception? These Congressional clowns will applaud ANYone getting them away from those dreadful Town Hells.

5:35PM
John McCain has the look of a man who can’t wait to twist the knife. Or, rather, he would, if he couldn’t be bought off so cheaply. He’ll flip, given half a chance.

5:35PM
“…unless everybody does their part…” My part consists of… the people under my roof. Now you go do your goddamn party. Mmmkay?

5:58PM
Self-reliance! Love of freedom! Skepticism of government! And socialized medicine! Sing it with me now: One of these things is not like the other…

I'll have to try this drunkblogging thing sometime.  Only one cocktail choice would be fitting: a Vicodin-tini.

6) As you have come to expect [and because I'm shameless],
Instapundit has up a great aggregation of commentary and analysis.

7) Over at Piece Of Work In Progress,
Dan Collins has produced a marvellous condensed version of the speech for all of us dumb hick pitchforkers.  A sample:

I would never do anything that would run up huge deficits. Honest. Also, when they’re not stealing your tonsils and hacking off your feet just for the fees, doctors are pretty good people.

And...
I want to be historic, and if you don’t let me, I’m going to stomp my foot take my TelePromTer and go home.

No one's stopping you, sir.

8) Our Fearless Leader now says that the number of people without health insurance stands at thirty million, down from the figure of forty-seven he has used in the past.  Over at Beltway Confidential, Byron York had this comment [the link in the quote hasn't been working; I had to eventually go and get it from Instapundit
here]:

Obama: I used to say 47 million uninsured. Now, it’s 30 million.“The interesting question is why Obama has chosen to downgrade the number from 47 million to 30 million. Look for Democrats to begin using the new figure in making the case for Obamacare.” If we keep going at this rate, we’ll have eliminated the uninsured entirely by sometime next spring....

As Ross Perot would say: 'Problem solved!'

9) Over at And So It Goes In Shreveport,
Pat lets the Liar-In-Chief have it:

What the lowering number of uninsured shows is that Obama realizes that the number of Americans without health insurance isn't as high as he wants us to believe. It tells us that he knew he was lying when he used the 47 million figure; he knew that was inflated. He'd HAVE to know that. He didn't care. He's selling snake oil here. He's lying....

10) Quin Hillyer also lets him have it three times with both barrels [
here, here, and here].  Two highlights:

.... and now he brings up the ghost of Teddy Kennedy. You knew this was coming. Cue the violins. Please. Give. Us. A Break.

"What drove him was something more." Maybe he ought not use that verb.

And...
I have trouble even listening to this self-important charlatan.

He said many of those who argue against his plan are "cynical and irresponsible." Call me cynical and irresponsible, then. Proudly so.

Is there something in the water in that part of the country that produces such orneriness as found in Pat and Quin?  If so, I want to drink me some.

11) Over at The Other McCain, Smitty is spot-on:

...The quantity of other Americans who are, or are not, happy with their situation isn't relevant when you're laid out, needing health care, and want your own full value delivered. "They're changing the policy, I'm doing my best, here's a complimentary iPod loaded with Obama speeches to tide you over until we can get that for you."--Ain't. Gonna. Cut. It.

12) At the end of a posting on the speech, Dan Riehl offers some quickie observations:

I figured out his strategy. He's going to put the country to sleep so they can pass the bill without us knowing it.

Kennedy could have made Mary Jo "better" just by opening the car door. What a joke.

Quoting Kennedy on American moralism?? Man, this guy has more gag lines than Gallager.

He mentioned townhalls? ha ha ha Now that was smart!

His door is always open? lol Why doesn't he just leave. Everyone would benefit immediately.

Will a public plan cover me if watching this idiot lie makes me sick?

What a bunch of morons we have on both sides.

On that last one: Amen, brother, amen!

On the Joe Wilson shoutout, Dan channels Tony Curtis:

I will say it was refreshing to see someone with a passion for truth unthinkingly inject some into a hall all too lacking in it last night thanks to Obama. In that sense, as cliche and leftist as it might sound, I very much am Joe Wilson in this case. And I am delighted to have seen at least one person there who actually spoke for me. It isn't as if I get to feel that during most Obama speeches, or even Congressional debates. So, I guess I am Joe Wilson. And I have absolutely no intention of apologizing for it to Obama, or anyone else.

I am Joe Wilson2.

13) After a day of reading serious and stridentcommentary, I enjoy visiting Dr. Helen's blog because she is always measured and calm and serene in her postings and demeanor.  However, today the respite is not there:

When I woke up this morning and read the Drudge headline linking to a story that Republican Congressman Joe Wilson called Obama a liar,my only thought was "it's about time." It's about time that Republicans play by the only rule book that works--that of Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicalsthat asks the question, "Does this particular end justify this particular means?" The answer in the case of Joe Wilson's truthful expose of Obama is "yes."

...

Those of us who do not toe the liberal line must stand up--just like Mr. Wilson. We are all radicals now.


Woh!  These are strange and confounding times indeed.

14) Pundette understands Rep. Wilson:

...I don't know just what went through Rep. Wilson's mind, but I can understand how, in a conflict between respecting the office of the POTUS, a worthy value, and standing up for truth and our liberty, the latter might take precedence.

Such are the times when such actions are quite understandable.

15) I like the cut of Paco's jib:

Yes, it was uncivil, and could possibly have backfired by stimulating a twinge of sympathy for the president, and it could conceivably set a bad precedent; but, hey, Mr. Combusta-pants and his ilk are all about speaking truth to power, right?

16) Finally: Mr. Combusta-pants [man, I love that one—bravo Paco] said at one point:

If you misrepresent what’s in the plan, we will call you out.

Right back at you, Mr. President, right back at you in spades.

SIDENOTE: The time on this posting maybe this morning, but I was unable to complete it until 1437 hours because the damn ISP was acting up again.  Otherwise, you would have seen it earlier.
10 sep 09 @ 10:45 am edt          Comments

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

A LITTLE HUMP DAY RULE 5
The TCOTS Rule 5 Compliance Committee hereby presents...

DEBRA PAGET...
ALHDR5-Debra-Paget-560.jpg
9 sep 09 @ 9:32 pm edt          Comments

'WAITING FOR O-DOUGH' IS HERE!
Smitty's latest effort, WAITING FOR O-DOUGH, has started to be posted in serial form over at The Other McCain.

The awaited sequel to his first triumphal effort, OEDIPOTUS WRECKS, this adaptation of Waiting For Godot is the story of two men [Stacy and Smitty] as they wait for their O-Dough to arrive.  I have read the full play and it is witty, sly, and spot-on [disclaimer: one of the characters is based on me].

I've set up a special section at the top of the right-hand column of this page with links to each part.  In addition to the critics and their comments listed in the first part, there are these ones:

Gen. Douglas MacArthur: I read it all. I came through. And I shall not return.

Gen. George S. Patton: No man ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard read something like this.

Ronald Reagan: Mr. Smith, tear down this posting!

Gen. William T. Sherman: O'Dough is all hell.

Julius Caesar: I came, I read, I wee-weed.

M. de Sade: And you call me a sadist? Oui, oui!

Abraham Lincoln: All-in-all, I'd rather take another trip to the theater.

Van 'The Red' Jones: (muffled sobs) Raaaaacist!

God: Oy vey! Time for another flood I'm thinking.

Jesus Of Nazareth: With this play, Smitty's nailed it--and I know a little bit about nailing [boom! boom!]. I'm here until sunset on Saturday, folks.

A Certain Prophet: This play is so good, when it becomes 9 years old, I'll marry it.
9 sep 09 @ 7:02 pm edt          Comments

LAST CHANCE
In the course of a very good posting covering several matters [Please do take the time to click here and read the Professor's full posting], Donald Douglas makes the following comment:

I'm just glad the tea parties are having such a phenomenal effect, and that the historical abomination of Obama 44 is increasingly looking like a one term deal. January 2013 can't come fast enough for this country; although, in consolation, I'm confident that Obama's inexperience and overreaching are sealing his rep as the worst president ever.

I hope the Professor proves to be a prophet.  However, we conservatives and libertarians have to be ready to offer a viable alternative to the folks who are in rebellion.  When I say 'alternative', I don't mean it in the sense that The Next Rightcrowd or the Frums of the world mean it.  Rather, I agree with Stacy McCain that:

Grassroots conservative activists are, by their very nature, not engaged in the political process as a career. They tend to be older, well-established in non-political occupations and less concerned about the Big Picture questions than in finding immediate, practical ways to oppose the menace of liberalism. The question one hears from the grassroots is not, "Whither conservatism?" but rather, "What can I do?"

It is enough that we want to rollback the radicalism of the past century.  No grand navel gazing is needed.  Those of us who have been in the trenches know what needs to be done and now, fortunately, those who have not paid close attention until recently have awoken and see what we see.  These navel-gazers would rather discuss the fine points of where the borders of the fringe should be then actually get off of their arses and do something.  The time for 'lively' discussions is over.  It is time for action.  Stacy is quite right when he writes:

By God, stand up on your hind legs and fight! Grab some liberal pet idea by the scruff of the neck and pound the crap out of it. Destroy the prestige of liberal ideas, and attack the prestige of liberal spokesmen, so that it is they who are compelled to cringe and flinch.

Pussyfooting around, concerning yourself with civility and respectability -- the Marquis of Queensbury rules that liberals insist conservatives respect, while they're rabbit-punching us and kneeing us in the groin -- is a tactical error that will inevitably lead to defeat.

This doesn't mean that conservatives must be rude and uncouth. Rather, it means we ought not be defeatist and cowardly, displaying the characteristic attitude of the man whose pride in good sportsmanship is closely related to his habit of losing.


We've got to take over the GOP like we did in 1964, but—and this is the key—we should not nominate a Goldwater in 2012 or tolerate any of the elected current GOP leadership [they're either incompetents or are suffering from a form of Stockholm Syndrome].  We need a Reagan to run for the Presidency: someone who is affable and who the American peoplecan identify with, who is like them.  And we need to support the Rubios and McCotters of this world.  Those Americans who have been roused to action will never identify with elitists, those who attend the same parties and conferences as Frum and Brooks and Parker and Noonan.  Nor will they feel comfortable with the smart young things like Patrick Ruffini and Conor Friedersdorf with their contemplation of higher things.

For the first time is decades, we have a chance to rollback the march of Leftism.  Enough people are with us.  This probably our last chance to save the Republic from degenerating into a situation where an Augustus will become the only hope.
9 sep 09 @ 5:01 pm edt          Comments

PROJECT 2996
All this week over at No Sheeples Here, Carol is honoring some of those who were murdered on 11 September 2001.

Please do take the time to click here and check out what she's done so far and for a link to the main project site. 

Thank you, Carol.

Also: Smitty knew one of people who perished on that day and he has posted his remembrance here.

Also: Obi's Sister has done one here.

If you have done any and would like them listed, please e-mail me.  I would be happy to provide the space.
9 sep 09 @ 2:34 pm edt          Comments

IN OTHER WORDS...
From the just-published interview in Men's Health with Dr. Killpanel, Peter Moore reporting:

Would the president consider so-called sin taxes, on soda and other sugar-laden products, or on activities that sabotage the health of the masses? (When I suggest this, I'm picturing tollbooths on every point of access to Vegas.)

"I actually think it's an idea that we should be exploring," the president says. "There's no doubt that our kids drink way too much soda. And every study that's been done about obesity shows that there is as high a correlation between increased soda consumption and obesity as just about anything else. Obviously it's not the only factor, but it is a major factor."

In other words: get ready for sin taxes!

Big tip of the fedora to John Kartch, over at AmSpecBlog, for slogging through the whole damn thing and bringing it to our attention.  He's spot-on when he comments:

Putting aside the fact a soda tax would violate Obama's central campaign promise not to raise "any form" of taxes on families making less than $250,000 a year, his statements indicate his support for use of the tax code as a tool to reward and punish certain behaviors as he sees fit.

This incident also reminds us of Obama's habit of giving a verbal head-fake to Americans' innate limited-government sentiments while simultaneously pushing to expand the role of government.


In other words: O is lying through his teeth again and thinks we're so stupid we won't see what he's doing.

What a pompous ass [with apologies to all the asses out there—yea, that means you O'Reilly].
9 sep 09 @ 2:21 pm edt          Comments

WHAT IS TRUTHER?
It's well known that Van Jones is a Truther, but, one has to wonder, how many on the Left believe we haven't been told the 'true story' of 09/11?  Over at The Pirate's Cove, William Teach has been looking into this question.  He also has been looking at what one New Jersey school district is going to teach about the attack:

In other words, what did we do wrong to make these terrorist nutjobs attack us.

Please do take the time to click here and read his full report.
9 sep 09 @ 2:06 pm edt          Comments

IT USUALLY BEGINS WITH MA GRAND
It all started with his grandmother.  Like any good tyrant, Comrade Obamnin is not afraid to discard those people who it has become an embarrassment to be associated with.  Many mangled bodies now lay beneath the red school bus owned by Hopeychange Inc..  Considering that our Fearless Leader does not ultimately believe in national boundaries and has not restricted his victims to only American citizens, it is only fitting that there has been developed an International Symbol for Thrown Under The Bus.  Designed by a reader of NRO and sent, with permission for use by anyone, to Rich 'The Kid' Lowry, we present it here for your visual and downloading pleasure:

Under_The_Bus_Sign-300.jpg

Whoever you are, I thank you personally.

We are also fortunate in that, over at The Gormogons, the Œcumenical Volgi has created a OED-type definition to accompany the sign.  Herewith [sorry Stacy], a highlight:

ro·ta·sub·ter·i·a·tion
\ˌrō-tə-səb-tēr-ē-ˈā-ʃən\, n., oft. fig., 1. to throw someone under a bus; to discard an individual once they no longer serve one’s purposes. 2. The state or result of being thrown under a bus or discarded as useless. Origin: Latin rŏta (“wheel”) and subterjăcĭo (“to throw under something”).
9 sep 09 @ 1:50 pm edt          Comments

A FUNGUS AMONG US
In my posting yesterday about those things we forget at our peril in light of the resignation of Van 'The Red' Jones, one of the things I listed was:

1) 'Serious' Jones may be gone, but don't be surprised if he still retains a time-share on Obama's ear.  The fact that Daschle still does, should be enough warning that this Bolshevik ain't really gone.

As if the gods were smiling upon me [they do occasionally], I have been delivered proof in Michelle Malkin's latest column.  A highlight:

Tom Daschle is the human toe fungus of Washington – a persistent infection that may disappear from time to time, but always comes back with a vengeance.

Despite abandoning his Secretary of Health and Human Services nomination in disgrace in February 2009, the K Street tax cheat who evaded IRS rules for years remains a top White House confidante and policy strategist. In fact, he’s leading the drive to save Obamacare. He climbed up from under the bus back into the Oval Office and onto the sets of Meet the Press and This Week with George Stephanopoulos to offer his rescue plan.

It’s Daschle’s idea to morph the unpopular “public option” into non-profit “health care co-ops” that will almost certainly receive government funding, support, and tax advantages over private insurers. Old colleagues on both sides of the Senate aisle are now promoting his alternative. Last week, he penned a Do It For Teddy Kennedy pep rally op-ed in the Wall Street Journal urging Democrats to go it alone and depend on the backroom Senate reconciliation process if necessary to get a deal done.


Please do take the time to click here and read the rest of her column.

'Tom Daschle is the human toe fungus of Washington'—absolutely brilliant.

I guess that makes 'Serious' Jones the toe jam of Washington?
9 sep 09 @ 11:33 am edt          Comments

I GOT BETTER
I'm not going to weigh-in on the 'pragmatic conservatives vs. strident conservatives' controversy just yet, but I would like to ask one related question...

Why would anyone who considers themselves a conservative want to listen to what this clown has to say anymore?  From Michelle Malkin:

This is what happens when you get too much Beltway on the brain.

Newt Gingrich - who sidled up on a couch with Nancy Pelosi for one of Al Gore's global warming ad campaigns - championed President Obama's education speech today.

Subtext be damned.

Gingrich, you should know, has been on a summer road trip with police-bashing, violence-inciting, race charlatan Al Sharpton and Obama Education Secretary Arne Duncan....

Forgetting Mr. Duncan for a moment...the 'Reverand' Sharpton is a thug and compulsive liar who has spent his life inciting his minions to violence and destroying other peoples lives and reputations.  In a just world, this felon would be behind bars by now [are you listening Hannity?].  Wake up fellow conservatives: Newt Gingrich is a narcissistic fool, a bad joke.  At one time, before 1995, he was a sane and rational man, worth listening to.  Now he's gone off the rails; he's out where the buses don't run.  IGNORE HIM, PLEASE.  He's just a pathetic has-been who fails to realize his moment in the sun has come, is gone, and never, ever, will return.
9 sep 09 @ 11:19 am edt          Comments

Tuesday, September 8, 2009

ITS TIME TO PLAY: 'WHO SAID IT?'
Who said it?....

I can find no warrant for such an appropriation in the Constitution and I do not believe that the power and duty of the general government ought to be extended to the relief of individual suffering which is in no manner properly related to the public service or benefit. A prevalent tendency to disregard the limited mission of this power and duty should I think be steadfastly resisted to the end that the lesson should be constantly enforced that though the people support the government the government should not support the people.

Over at WyBlog, Chris has the answer.
8 sep 09 @ 8:00 pm edt          Comments

CHIC
Victor Davis Hanson had a very interesting general observation yesterday after 'Serious' Jones's resignation was announced.  After describing the latest outrages committed by Oliver Stone and Michael Moore, he wrote:

Van Jones, solidly middle class and Yale-educated, among other things, pontificated about revolution, an apartheid America, redistributing wealth, a—hole Republicans and George Bush's involvement in 9/11, in between jetting between conferences, espousing his green jobs promotion that hyped book sales and his own career.

What is strange about all this chic-radicalism is how would-be revolutionaries that wish to dismantle America as we know it and/or emulate failed systems abroad, always do so from comfort, security, affluence, and freedom of choice unique to America and Europe, suggesting that radical politics and those who agitate for them are sort of a fashion statement, aimed to resonate among particular elite leftist audiences and to bring dividends from them, but not to be taken too seriously as guides in their own lives.


Quite.  We saw the same thing in Old Russia during the reign of the last Tsar.  At one point, however, the elitest Leftists were forced to take it all seriously—in the seconds before they were shot dead by the Bolsheviks.
8 sep 09 @ 7:39 pm edt          Comments

ENJOY YOURSELF: IT'S LATER THAN YOU THINK
While we can all enjoy a bit of celebrating over the resignation of Van 'The Red' Jones, there are a few things we forget at our peril:

1) 'Serious' Jones may be gone, but don't be surprised if he still retains a time-share on Obama's ear.  The fact that Daschle still does, should be enough warning that this Bolshevik ain't really gone.

2) We have made the Left even more furious with us than they have been lately.  Be prepared for them to come at us with everything they've got.  None of us is safe.  Red was one of their golden boys.  They will not forgive us for this and, in their paranoia and out of fear, the Left will lash out at us.  Be prepared for our lives to be looked into.  They will especially go after people like Glenn Beck, Michelle Malkin, and people like Gateway Pundit Jim Hoft [Such tactics of intimidation and threats to livelihood come straight from the Leftist playbook and have been practiced for quite some time in milder form by people with names like Carville, Begala, Clinton, Olbermann, and Reid, and in the harshest form by Stalin, Mao, Che, and Lenin (who may well be the originator of the tactics). In other words, for the Left this is S.T.O.P.].

3) This is only the beginning of the beginning of the hunt.  As Mike, over at Cold Fury, puts it [tip of the fedora to Donald Douglas]:

For far too long, Americans have tolerated encroachments on their liberty; expansions in the reach, size, and power of government; and the incremental abrogation of Constitutional restrictions on same because it was going on clandestinely, behind closed doors (below the radar might be a better way of putting it). It’s also why I said a while back that Obama’s ascension just might’ve been the best thing that ever could have happened to this country. It amounted to a much-needed wake-up call, one that we wouldn’t have gotten if McCain had been elected and the covert usurpation of our government had continued, perpetrated behind the scenes by more moderate-seeming but no less dedicated statists at every level of the federal Leviathan.

To clean out a rats’ nest, you first have to be able to see the damned rats. Jones will slink off to another sub-surface “community organizer” type job, perhaps even on the federal payroll, and another just like him will take his place…quietly, without much in the way of fanfare. It’s up to the rest of us to keep our eyes open for it — to stay awake, so the Democrat Socialist rats won’t find it so easy to steal what little remains of our freedom, and remake what’s left of our Constitutional republic.

However, we can allow ourselves a few moments of celebration.....how about a rather fitting classic:
8 sep 09 @ 7:26 pm edt          Comments

PROJECT 2996 @ NO SHEEPLES HERE
All this week over at No Sheeples Here, Carol is honoring some of those who were murdered on 11 September 2001.

Please do take the time to click here and check out what she's done so far and for a link to the main project site. 

Thank you, Carol.

Also: Smitty knew one of people who perished on that day and he has posted his remembrance here.
8 sep 09 @ 6:55 pm edt          Comments

A = A?
Over at American Power, Donald Douglas has excerpts and links from Charles Krauthammer and Andrew McCarthy regarding their disagreement on having a communist working in the Executive Branch.  In the course of an aside, Professor Douglas makes a very good point:

It turns out that Charles Krauthammer, speaking of Van Jones during Thursday's Fox News All-Stars, suggested that:

I'm not even disturbed that this guy is a communist. It is not the first time we had a communist in the U.S. government. And anyway, with the death of communism, it is a kind of a pathetic intellectual anachronism to remain a communist.

Well, it's not that pathetic, at least not to all the young people enthralled with communist paraphernalia (Che chic comes to mind, but Obama-mania is Soviet-like in its cult of personality). These are the same young people who routinely demonstrate under the neo-Stalinist banner. I write about it all the time. I think that, actually, the further we're removed historically from the brutality of Soviet rule during the Cold War, combined with the popularization of a pseudo-hip antiwar-postmodernism, there's no real recoil against the idea of Marxist-Leninist ideologies. Folks even laugh when they hear the word "communism," since that's, well, ancient history for many. Now it's "progressive" to praise Castro's healthcare regime, and that's not just by idealistic college kids, but by members of Congress!

I certainly get strange looks these days when I use the word 'communist'; some look at me like they were watching an old newsreel.  I'm sure they think of me as a quaint anachronism.  I have never understood why people on the Right went along with the myth that communism died with the fall of the Soviet Union, when clearly it was alive on the college campuses of The West and still the governing philosophy of a good number of nations.  And, obviously, it stayed very much alive among the chic elite.

Realizing that the labels 'liberal' and 'communist' were poison, the Left decided to adopt the term 'progressive'.  This has provided radical Leftists, who in the past could have never been allowed to hold respectable positions in government and business, to do so under the false skin of the word.  Thus, the appointment of a Van Jones arouses no controversy among the great muddled middle.  After all, he's a progressive, just a liberal.  Or as the Prof. puts it:

That's what I mean when I say there are "no enemies on the left." By calling themselves "progressives," today's neo-communists seek respectability.

Exactly.  They are one and the same.  The Left has been fairly successful is saying C is not C, but is, rather, P, as is L is not L [or, to be mischievous: C is CCCP].

Please do take the time to click here and read his full posting.
8 sep 09 @ 2:01 pm edt          Comments

Monday, September 7, 2009

THE UTES OF AMERICA
I don't know about you, but I'm looking forward to our Fearless Leader's address to the school children of America tomorrow....not.

Did you know that there's an Obama Youth League and that they have a website?

And that kids are being told to go there to get instructions on how to help the President and snitch on his opponents?

No?  Well then you might want to check out the site by clicking here.

Obama-OYL-Flag-560url.jpg
7 sep 09 @ 8:25 pm edt          Comments

I PITY THE FOOL
From The Times Of London, Tim Reid reporting, we learn:

It is a clear homage to perhaps the most iconic White House photograph.

Almost 46 years after the world first saw two-year-old John F. Kennedy Jr playing under the Oval Office desk as his father worked, the White House has released a picture of Sasha Obama, 8, hiding behind a sofa as President Obama reads briefing papers at the same desk.

According to the White House, Sasha is sneaking up on her father as he nears the end of a working day behind the Resolute desk, which was a gift from Queen Victoria to President Rutherford B. Hayes in 1879.

The original photograph, taken in October 1963, a month before President Kennedy was assassinated, shows John Jr peering out from under the desk as his father, like Mr Obama, reviews briefing papers. It was a photograph that helped to promote the image of Kennedy’s Camelot — the youthful President running the country with a young family playing at his side in the White House.


A 'homage'?  I find it rather just pathetic.

I'm tempted to say to him: 'Be your own man, you metrosexual pantywaist', but I won't.
7 sep 09 @ 7:20 pm edt          Comments

THE WISDOM OF JOE FRIDAY
I've created a new page where I'll be posting videos of Sgt. Joe Friday speaking wisdom for the ages.

First up: Sgt. Friday and Officer Gannon educate Barack Hussein Obama on the greatness of America.

[tip of the fedora to the Œcumenical Volgi at The Gormogons]
7 sep 09 @ 5:44 pm edt          Comments

UP IN SMOKE
I was forced to give up smoking in 2001 [21 July at 0011 hours, to be exact] after my doctor warned me that the fact that I had smoked four packs a day for twenty years meant, if I continued to use the devil's weed, I would be toting around an air tank within a few years.  So, I reluctantly given 'em up [Thank God for Nicorette, which I still use to this day].  However, I'm proud to say that I never became, like so many ex-smokers do, an anti-smoking whack job.  In fact, both Mrs. B and I encourage our friends to 'smoke 'em if you got 'em' when friends come over.  Smoking is one of the greatest pleasures in life: it is a miracle plant, able to calm you down when things get rough and wake you up if you're sliding into a life-induced coma.  It is a sign of being civilized.  As Ayn Rand wrote:

I like to think of fire held in a man's hand. Fire, a dangerous force, tamed at his fingertips. I often wonder about the hours when a man sits alone, watching the smoke of a cigarette, thinking. I wonder what great things have come from such hours. When a man thinks, there is a spot of fire alive in his mind--and it is proper that he should have the burning point of a cigarette as his one expression.

So I begrudge no man or woman their smoking.  Mrs. B. and I enjoy being around it.  I despise what the governments at all levels have been trying to do to smokers; I despise their assuming they have the right to lecture the sovereign people of America about their health.  So it is with great pleasure that I provide you with a link to a Dan Collins posting on making your own cigarettes and saving a boatload of money.  Fight The Power!

Please do take the time to click here.
7 sep 09 @ 4:53 pm edt          Comments

SPEAKING OF CAPO VAN 'THE RED'...
...Michelle Malkin is dead solid perfect:

The story is not just about Beck or Fox or us racist conservatives martyring Van Jones.

The story is not just about Jones.

The story is about
Adolfo Carrion, Carol Browner, Vivek Kundra, Nancy DeParle, John Holdren, Cass Sunstein, Mark Lloyd, Obama’s education comrades, and the culture of circumvention and corruption that plagues this White House.

The story is the
czar explosion, purposeful undermining of congressional oversight, Valerie Jarrett’s promotion of a two-bit Jeremiah Wright in eco-guru’s clothing, and the public vetting of unaccountable Obama appointees that Washington won’t do.

Please do take the time to click here and read the full posting which contains a lot of good reaction links from both sides.

I know others have already said this, but let me say it as well: don;t expect 'Serious' Jones to really go away.  He's merely gone underground like Daschle.  Tiberius Obamacus will still be listening to his advice.  I'd be will to bet on it.

The ever-growing Memeorandum thread is to be found here.

Some other good postings worthy of a click are...

-Stacy McCain is all over this one like a fly on...well...you know.  Check out his postings here and here and here.  And he also has a good one on the Left's reaction, especially from the toup-ass-crazy Olbermann and the eternally annoying A. 'Hole' Holmes.

-Jimmie Bise has a very good round-up and some excellent analysis here.

-Smitty takes on one of the Huffer Puffers [what is the dude smokin'?] here.

-Pat Austin compliments Smitty's remarks with her own here.  Check out her first posting on the resignation hereand her using it to make a larger point here.

-Paco Enterprises audits things here and here.

-Good stuff from Dan Collins over at Piece Of Work In Progress.  I did not know Valerie Jarrett's father was a Bolshe.

-To be a little immodest [well, actually, a lot], it was I who first broke the news of the end of Capo Regime Jones on Friday Evening here.
7 sep 09 @ 4:32 pm edt          Comments

THE SPOT-ON QUOTE OF THE DAY: Van Jones Edition...
...is awarded to Bill Kristol:

But, I was amused by this fact. If you just read the New York Times you would know nothing about this. The mainstream media did not cover this story. You wouldn't learn about it on network news. The New York Times readers tomorrow morning are going to pick up the print New York Times and for the first time discover that there was a huge controversy about this radical who was quite at a high level at the White House. So its a an interesting case study I think where some of the blogs, a guy named Jim Hoft in St. Louis, Missouri who runs a blog called Gateway Pundit did much more reporting on this than the entire mainstream media.

Great job Jim.  The American people owe you a debt of gratitude.
7 sep 09 @ 3:51 pm edt          Comments


Archive Newer | Older

Dispatches are archived by week; click on the links above.



Wolverines-Logo-370.jpg

'This one was worth the fight.
And it's only one fight in the battle, and we have to keep fighting.'

—Doug Hoffman


The Restoration will not be televised; it will be blogged.
—Robert Belvedere


IG-Gate-LinkLogo.jpg
Click The Picture Above For The Latest Updates/Linkage

'Bob Belvedere may have the best compilationof IG-Gate information.'
Robert Stacy McCain

'Robert Belvedere at The Camp of the Saints appears to be maintaining the definitive index of all things PIG-gate...at TCOTS. ...This is an excellent resource. We thank you, sir.'
Smitty

'More great commentary and juicy links on l'affaire IG from Camp of the Saints..'
Paco


Czar-dOz-342.jpg


Obama-CYL-Flag-342.jpg



- DETECTIVE PACO in -
Dectective-Paco-Sm-342.jpg

Part 1  ◊  Part 2  ◊  Part 3

WAITING FOR O-DOUGH
by Christopher L. Smith

An Adaptation of the Modern Masterpiece

Characters / Critics
♦ Act I
♦ Act II

OediPOTUS Wrecks
by Christopher L. Smith
An Adaptation of the Classic Play

♦ Characters / Critics
♦ Prologue
♦ Scene I
♦ Scene II
♦ Scene III
♦ Finale


Captain Ohab:
'From hell's heart I stab at thee; for hate's sake I spit my last breath at thee. Ye damned Fox News.'

Dont-Tread-On-Me-240.jpg
Israeli-Gadsden-Flag-300.jpg
Taiwan-Flag-300b.jpg

I may be reached at
Robert.Belvedere AT gmail DOT com


FELLOW DHS-CERTIFIED
RIGHT-WING EXTREMISTS
- The Other McCain -
-
The Corner at NRO -
-
Mark Steyn Online -
- Quin Hillyer -
-
AmSpecBlog -
-
Victor Davis Hanson -
-
Red State -
-
Powerline -
-
Michael Ledeen -
-
Contentions -
-
Rachel Lucas -
- John Derbyshire -
- Vlad Tepes -
- Michelle Malkin -
- Pundit & Pundette -
- JammieWearingFool -
- Monique Stuart -
- Josh Painter -
- The Sundries Shack -
- Paco Enterprises -
- The Classic Liberal -
- American Power -
- Piece Of Work In Progress -
- The Pirate's Cove -
- Eye Of Polyphemus -
- Atlas Shrugs -
- No Sheeples Here -
- And So It Goes In Shreveport -
- Troglopundit -
- Ann Coulter -
- The Gormogons -
- WyBlog -
- Riehl World View -
- Caught Him With A Corndog -
- An Ol' Broad's Ramblings -
- Liberty Belle -
- Another Black Conservative -
- Common Cents -
- Jaded Haven -
- Cassy Fiano -
- TOTUS -
- Soylent Green -
- In Mala Fide -
- My Voice On The Wings Of Change -
- What Would The Founding Fathers Do -
- Washington Rebel -


LEST WE FORGET...
CoastGuardAnniversary-17900804.jpg
04 AUGUST 1790: The Founding of the U.S. Coast Guard


NotOneRedCentBlogAdSmall.jpg
Please click on the image and visit the site.

Please click here to read
Behind the ‘Not One Red Cent’ Rebellion
by ROBERT STACY MCCAIN


IR5BF2009-Banner74.jpg

OffendAFeminist.jpg

WHAT IS A TRILLION?
[tip of the fedora to Jonah Goldberg]

Click here and here to find out why I think
Robert Stacy McCain is
THE CONSERVATIVE SHAFT


NTCNewsLogo01a.jpg


DenouncedBy-TVV.jpg

MY KENYAN BIRTH CERTIFICATE
Robert-Belvedere-Kenyan-Birth-Certificate-180.jpg
Please Click on the Image to View Full Size
Michelle-Malkin-Culture-Of-Corruption.jpg
GOP_CapAndTax8.jpg
Please click on the image above to learn more from Michelle Malkin.
Pavlik-Morozov-Award-Paco.jpg

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

T E R M S

Let us make precise and clear-cut the terms we should be using.

Aristotle wrote that A is A; you may also call it B, but it always remains A. A thing is what it is and, to say it is something else, is to deny reality. There is a lot of denial of reality going around these days.

As John Adams wrote: 'Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence'.

POINT 1:  There is no "War in Iraq" or "War in Afghanistan".  Like the Pacific and Europe in World War II, Iraq and Afghanistan are just parts of a larger war.  Unlike them, they are not separate from each other.  Therefore, they are part of the Middle East Theatre of Operations [METO] as the Pacific was the PTO and Europe the ETO.

POINT 2: Many on the Left and some on the Right want to "end the War".  There are only two ways to end a war: (1) by achieving Victory or (2) by being Defeated.  A pullout, before Victory is achieved, is Defeat.  They want Defeat.  Pullout may be the best policy―I am not arguing that here―but, leaving without achieving our objective is Defeat.

POINT 3: We are engaged in a War Against Islam.  The term is more correct than "War against Islamo-Fascism" or "War On Terror". 

Islam has been at war with all non-Muslims since the time of its founder, Muhammad [his name be cursed].  Like the Hundred Years' War, there have been periods of peace in this long conflict, but the Muslim has never stopped believing that he is at war with all non-Muslims.  He can't: Allah commands that all of the world be conquered in his name and he must submit, in all things, to the will of Allah [the word Islam means "submission", sometimes rendered as "surrender"].  Any periods of peace we in the West have enjoyed have only occurred after we have dealt them such a devastating blow that they have not been able to wage their jihad and then have pursued polices that have kept them subjugated.  This began to fade in the latter half of the 20th Century as we forgot the dangers posed by this militant religion and as they regrouped under new and committed leaders.

If you doubt that Islam is at war with all non-Muslims, keep in mind this:
Islamic apologists often point out that Islam is not a monolith and that there are differences of opinion among the different Islamic schools of thought. That is true, but, while there are differences, there are also common elements. Just as Orthodox, Roman Catholic, and Protestant Christians differ on many aspects of Christianity, still they accept important common elements. So it is with Islam. One of the common elements to all Islamic schools of thought is jihad, understood as the obligation of the Ummah to conquer and subdue the world in the name of Allah and rule it under Sharia law. The four Sunni Madhhabs (schools of fiqh [Islamic religious jurisprudence]) -- Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hanbali -- all agree that there is a collective obligation on Muslims to make war on the rest of the world. Furthermore, even the schools of thought outside Sunni orthodoxy, including Sufism and the Jafari (Shia) school, agree on the necessity of jihad. When it comes to matters of jihad, the different schools disagree on such questions as whether infidels must first be asked to convert to Islam before hostilities may begin (Osama bin Laden asked America to convert before Al-Qaeda’s attacks); how plunder should be distributed among victorious jihadists; whether a long-term Fabian strategy against dar al-harb is preferable to an all-out frontal attack; etc.

[Source: Gregory M. Davis, Islam 101, section 4g, found at http://www.jihadwatch.org/islam101/]

They have been at war with us for centuries and we, therefore, have been at war with them.  We are engaged in a War Against Islam whether we want to say so or not.  In an interview with a Pakistani TV network on 23 July 2008, Mustafa Abu Al-Yazid, Al-Qaeda's No. 3 man and top commander in Afghanistan, has this to say: “Islam does not distinguish between the American people and the American government, since both are in a state of war with Islam”.

[Source: http://www.memri.org/bin/latestnews.cgi?ID=SD200008]

POINT 4: The term "Islamo-Fascism" seems to have been created by Leftists.  Since (1) they wrongly place fascism on the Right, (2) they believe [rightly] Muslims want to establish a theocratic regime on Earth, and (3) anything political that has any connection with religion is bad and emanates out of rightwing thinking, the term makes sense to them.  Therefore, the term is nothing but a way to associate Islam with the right-wing.  Muslims believe in a totalitarian way of governing; in submission [that word] to an all-powerful Islamic leader or leaders.

POINT 5: As to the term "War On Terror", it is just plain silly: how can you wage war on a thing?

POINT 6: What is fascism?  It is when a government allows private property to exist, but controls and manages the use and disposal of property in all its forms.  Citizens retain all of the burdens and responsibilities associated with property ownership, but are not allowed to control and shape its use.

As an economic system, fascism is socialism with a capitalist veneer. The word derives from fasces, the Roman symbol of collectivism and power: a tied bundle of rods with a protruding ax. In its day (the 1920s and 1930s), fascism was seen as the happy medium between boom-and-bust-prone liberal capitalism, with its alleged class conflict, wasteful competition, and profit-oriented egoism, and revolutionary Marxism, with its violent and socially divisive persecution of the bourgeoisie. Fascism substituted the particularity of nationalism and racialism—“blood and soil”—for the internationalism of both classical liberalism and Marxism.

Where socialism sought totalitarian control of a society’s economic processes through direct state operation of the means of production, fascism sought that control indirectly, through domination of nominally private owners. Where socialism nationalized property explicitly, fascism did so implicitly, by requiring owners to use their property in the “national interest”—that is, as the autocratic authority conceived it. (Nevertheless, a few industries were operated by the state.) Where socialism abolished all market relations outright, fascism left the appearance of market relations while planning all economic activities. Where socialism abolished money and prices, fascism controlled the monetary system and set all prices and wages politically. In doing all this, fascism denatured the marketplace. Entrepreneurship was abolished. State ministries, rather than consumers, determined what was produced and under what conditions.
[Source: Sheldon Richman, The Concise Encylcopedia Of Economics, Liberty Fund, found at http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Fascism.html]

On the political spectrum, therefore, it is located between modern liberalism and socialism.

POINT 7: What is socialism?  It is when a government allows no private property to exist, and controls and manages the use and disposal of property in all its forms.  Citizens are not allowed to control their lives and are subject to the whims of bureaucrats and officials.  If they retain freedoms and liberties, they do so at the discretion of them.   On the political spectrum, therefore, it is the next logical stage after fascism; some would argue that it lies between fascism and communism.

POINT 8: What is pragmatism?  It is a tool used by Leftists, or those operating under the influence of Leftist logic, to achieve Utopian ends—heaven on earth through social, political, cultural, and spiritual engineering.  It is merely a tool of ideology, part of the means to an end.

POINT 9:The Big Lie - When confronted with truths that reflect unpleasantly on them, the Leftists deflect it buy claiming over-an-over ad nauseum that these truths apply to and are products of the Right.  This practice is known as The Big Lie.  It has been successfully practiced by the Left since, at the very least, the French Revolution.  Thus, we have the now-widespread belief that the Nazis and the Black Shirts of Italy were right-wingers when the reality-the truth-is they were both people of the Left.  I suspect the violent objections from the Left to conservatives use of the term 'fascist' arise from the fact that they have spent well over seventy years trying to convince the world of The Big Lie that it is not and never has been a Leftist ideology.

How does one practice this distortion truth and why is it effective?  In a report issued during World War II by the OSS, the author provided an explanation for all practitioners by describing how Hitler practiced it:

His primary rules were: never allow the public to cool off; never admit a fault or wrong; never concede that there may be some good in your enemy; never leave room for alternatives; never accept blame; concentrate on one enemy at a time and blame him for everything that goes wrong; people will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it.

By repeating their lies over and over, the Left creates a false reality that supplements the real world.  In this false reality, the lie is the truth, the truth is the lie.  A is not A.  [But we know that A must always be A.]

The Left also practices a variation of The Big Lie that I like to call The Big Deception which involves a Big Deflection away from the reality of the situation.  None of their policies or actions can survive direct questioning, so the Leftists must turn the tables on the questioners and make it seem as though the inquisitors have bad or evil intentions. Overtime and after constant and unrelenting hectoring, the Left's way of thinking triumphs.  They successfully infect enough people so that this diseased mode of thinking becomes chronic, deep-rooted, instinctual.  If the Devil's greatest triumph was that he convinced people he did not exist, the Left's greatest triumph has been to convince people that the Leftist way of thinking is normal.  It is not.  It is a perversion of reason and a horribly mutant form of logic. It is antithetical to human life.  Nothing but decay and destruction are left [pun intended] in it's wake.


What They're Saying About
BOB BELVEDERE &
The Camp Of The Saints...

'Sir Bob of Belvedere'
Smitty

'So many good things at Camp of the Saints that you need to just click and keep scrolling.'
Paco

'Go, read it, fine stuff over there!'
GatorDoug

''Belvederus Maximus'
Smitty

'You are contributing to a noble yet futile cause -- the butchification of metrosexuals.
TCOTS roolz!
'
Red

'[H]e takes retro dame blogging to a new, narrative noir level.'
Smitty

'Staunch Rule 5 aficionado Bob Belvedere, is shameless indeed (I have so much respect for this man)!'
The Classic Liberal

'Who knew he was such a fan of the undead?'
Smitty

'We need fighters, and I suspect Beck will fight 'til ev'ry foe is vanquished.
Bob Belvedere gets it. Phyllis Chesler gets it.
We defend truth and liberty against lies and tyranny. Every eye is upon us and we are surrounded by enemies as numerous as the grains of sand on the shore. Let us determine to die here, and we will conquer.
WOLVERINES!'
Stacy McCain

'Bob Belvedere, you're a nasty piece of work.'
Anonymous

'you charming rogue'
Robert

'The sad decay of Bob Belvedere into a Rule 5 junkie saddens us all.'
Smitty

'Belvedere went slightly crazy on us.'
Smitty

'And thank you, Dr. Belvedere, for setting me straight on Rule 5! I tell ya, that Belvedere Dude is Funny!'
Irish Cicero

'Kevin Binversie is not nearly so shameless a blogwhore as Troglopundit . . .
but then again, nobody really is. OK, maybe
Bob Belvedere, as if anyone could compete with Bob.'
Stacy McCain

'Lord Fatheringay von Whoopsie of the Dung Heap Hooter'
—Anon. —


This site  The Web 








"...Satan shall be loosed out of his prison and shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth...to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea.  And they went up on the breadth of the earth, and encompassed the Camp of the Saints...and the Beloved City: and the fire came down from God out of heaven, and devoured them...."

Revelation 20:7-9

All original material ©2008/2009 by Robert Belvedere.